jeanlucias

about-fiddle

and there is also pitch~, as part of tristan jehans collection.

again, depends on how you filddle with the parameters ;-)

i got it to recognize lower frequencies pretty reliable.

Am 10.11.2006 um 05:25 schrieb Jean-François Charles:

> Maybe [fiddle~] with other parameters (not "better parameters", but 

> parameters according to your environment").

> Pitch detection is not an easy task, and does not have always a unique

> You have surely already searched www.maxobjects.com

> yin~ has been reported very, very good. It is distributed in the 

> (read it is not free). I don't know if there is a UB and Windows 

>> Is there any object better than fiddle~ for detecting the pitch?

>> 雅虎免费邮箱-3.5G容量，20M附件

and there is also pitch~, as part of tristan jehans collection.
is it better than fiddle~?
again, depends on how you filddle with the parameters ;-)
i got it to recognize lower frequencies pretty reliable.

hans w. koch
im krahnenhof 11
d-50668 koeln
+49-221-554902
www.hans-w-koch.net

> Maybe [fiddle~] with other parameters (not "better parameters", but  
> "better
> parameters according to your environment").
> Pitch detection is not an easy task, and does not have always a unique
> correct answer.
> You have surely already searched www.maxobjects.com
> yin~ has been reported very, very good. It is distributed in the  
> Ircam Forum
> (read it is not free). I don't know if there is a UB and Windows  
> versions.
>
>
> At 11/9/06 10:08 PM, you wrote :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Is there any object better than fiddle~ for detecting the pitch?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Jeanlucias
>>
>>
>>
>> 雅虎免费邮箱-3.5G容量，20M附件
>> http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/
>
>
>


As far as I remember from the documentation of pitch~, it is derived

> and there is also pitch~, as part of tristan jehans collection.

> again, depends on how you filddle with the parameters ;-)

> i got it to recognize lower frequencies pretty reliable.

> Am 10.11.2006 um 05:25 schrieb Jean-François Charles:

> > Maybe [fiddle~] with other parameters (not "better parameters", but

> > parameters according to your environment").

> > Pitch detection is not an easy task, and does not have always a unique

> > You have surely already searched www.maxobjects.com

> > yin~ has been reported very, very good. It is distributed in the

> > (read it is not free). I don't know if there is a UB and Windows

> >> Is there any object better than fiddle~ for detecting the pitch?

> >> 雅虎免费邮箱-3.5G容量，20M附件

As far as I remember from the documentation of pitch~, it is derived
from fiddle~...

On 10/11/06, hans w. koch  wrote:
> and there is also pitch~, as part of tristan jehans collection.
> is it better than fiddle~?
> again, depends on how you filddle with the parameters ;-)
> i got it to recognize lower frequencies pretty reliable.
>
> hans
>
> hans w. koch
> im krahnenhof 11
> d-50668 koeln
> +49-221-554902
> www.hans-w-koch.net
>
> Am 10.11.2006 um 05:25 schrieb Jean-François Charles:
>
> > Maybe [fiddle~] with other parameters (not "better parameters", but
> > "better
> > parameters according to your environment").
> > Pitch detection is not an easy task, and does not have always a unique
> > correct answer.
> > You have surely already searched www.maxobjects.com
> > yin~ has been reported very, very good. It is distributed in the
> > Ircam Forum
> > (read it is not free). I don't know if there is a UB and Windows
> > versions.
> >
> >
> > At 11/9/06 10:08 PM, you wrote :
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Is there any object better than fiddle~ for detecting the pitch?
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> Jeanlucias
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 雅虎免费邮箱-3.5G容量，20M附件
> >> http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>


about fiddle~