Peter Nyboer

I don't think you have to be a model to use it, but I'm not entirely 

seems interesting...
http://alphagrips.com/
I don't think you have to be a model to use it, but I'm not entirely 
sure.

ag5-input-device

You probably do if you want one of the pink ones.

"IMPORTANT INFORMATION: The AlphaGrip may not be ergonomic" it says 

You know what's weird? It claims to be "Enhanced QWERTY", and sure 

enough, if you squint at the buttons, it still is kind-of QWERTY, 

which itself is thoroughly unergonomic. What's all that about?

nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- 

"IMPORTANT INFORMATION: The AlphaGrip may not be ergonomic" it says  
here.

You know what's weird? It claims to be "Enhanced QWERTY", and sure  
enough, if you squint at the buttons, it still is kind-of QWERTY,  
which itself is thoroughly unergonomic. What's all that about?

   nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http:// 
www.cassiel.com


don't have to be a model to use this one, but you need breasts : 

http://www.statesman.com/business/content/business/stories/t

don't have to be a model to use this one, but you need breasts : 
  http://www.statesman.com/business/content/business/stories/t echnology/12/16bizfocus.html


I think the rationale is that using this device won't hurt your

ability to use a regular QWERTY keyboard, which is something that has

plagued users of other alternative input schemes such as the dvorak

I think the rationale is that using this device won't hurt your
ability to use a regular QWERTY keyboard, which is something that has
plagued users of other alternative input schemes such as the dvorak
keyboard layout.

The wired jock strap is coming soon, don't worry.

Talking about Wired, they have someone who writes about (please 

delete this message immediately if you're under age in the 

jurisdiction of your residence) "teledildonics". You may want to look 

As for QWERTY not being ergonomic, I'm not sure where Nick's coming 

from on that. Sholes' invention was (despite some legend to the 

contrary) designed to allow people to type faster with the hardware 

of the day, and his design achieved what it set out to do. What's 

wrong with that? I learned to touch type when I was too young to read 

Regina Lynn (and before she was born, for good measure). One of the 

Peter Castine | +--> Litter Power & Litter Bundle for Jitter

|....................................................

p@castine.de | iCE: Sequencing, Recording, and Interface Building

4-15@kagi.com |....................................................

Talking about Wired, they have someone who writes about (please  
delete this message immediately if you're under age in the  
jurisdiction of your residence) "teledildonics". You may want to look  
that up. Or not.

As for QWERTY not being ergonomic, I'm not sure where Nick's coming  
from on that. Sholes' invention was (despite some legend to the  
contrary) designed to allow people to type faster with the hardware  
of the day, and his design achieved what it set out to do. What's  
wrong with that? I learned to touch type when I was too young to read  
Regina Lynn (and before she was born, for good measure). One of the  
most useful skills I ever learned.

--------------    http://www.bek.no/~pcastine/Litter/    -------------
Peter Castine    |        +--> Litter Power & Litter Bundle for Jitter
                  |....................................................
p@castine.de     | iCE:  Sequencing, Recording, and Interface Building
pcastine@gmx.net |       for Max/MSP
pcastine@bek.no  | http://www.dspaudio.com/             Extremely cool
4-15@kagi.com    |....................................................
                  | home|chez nous|wir|i nostri  http://www.castine.de/

On 16 Mar 2006, at 19:33, Peter Castine wrote:

> Talking about Wired, they have someone who writes about [...] 

> As for QWERTY not being ergonomic, I'm not sure where Nick's coming 

> Talking about Wired, they have someone who writes about [...]  
> "teledildonics".

> As for QWERTY not being ergonomic, I'm not sure where Nick's coming  
> from on that.

On 16-Mar-2006, at 20:47, Nick Rothwell wrote:

http://www.wired.com/storylist/1306-0-0.html

On 16-Mar-2006, at 20:47, Nick Rothwell wrote:
> What, full-time?

ag5 input device...