Cycling 74 » Topic: Am I silly to use begin~? http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/am-i-silly-to-use-begin/feed Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:00:29 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4 http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/am-i-silly-to-use-begin/#post-64197 <![CDATA[Am I silly to use begin~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/am-i-silly-to-use-begin/#post-64197 Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:11:00 +0000 oivindi I have a poly patch embedded within another patch. This poly patch has about four or five different effects (delay, bitreduction, granulation etc.), and they are all going into a selector~. From the main patch I decide which of the selector~ inputs should be active, because I am only using one effect at a time from the poly~ patch.

However, this (of course) means that some effects are active, even though they aren’t being used. So I found the begin~ object, but noticed the doc says it is an “semi-obsolete object”, and that the poly~ object is recommended instead.

Is it stupid of me to use the begin~ object? And how would I implement these effects into a poly patch?

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/am-i-silly-to-use-begin/#post-231528 <![CDATA[Re: Am I silly to use begin~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/am-i-silly-to-use-begin/#post-231528 Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:16:59 +0000 Rodrigo I recently dropped mute~ in my patches for the same reason.

What you can do is just compartmentalise each individual effect as it’s own poly (that’s what I do) and have the bypassing/routing happen outside of poly as well, so that way “dry” audio always works.

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/am-i-silly-to-use-begin/#post-231529 <![CDATA[Re: Am I silly to use begin~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/am-i-silly-to-use-begin/#post-231529 Sun, 02 Sep 2012 23:58:30 +0000 Floating Point you could also have 3 polys inside the parent poly (nested polys)

]]>