Forums > MaxMSP

any correction for this patch?

September 17, 2009 | 4:13 pm

Dear advanced users,

I am not sure, the following patch is programmed in the most compact logic.
Can anybody give me an advice?

Sincerely,
prko

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

September 17, 2009 | 4:32 pm
prko wrote on Thu, 17 September 2009 09:13
Dear advanced users,

I am not sure, the following patch is programmed in the most compact logic.
Can anybody give me an advice?

It makes sense to me. Does it work?

mz


September 17, 2009 | 4:41 pm

It does work.
I want to just know, if one can see the name that is created automatically in the object [send~].
In my patch, I have an extra message box, in order to display the name which is automatically created.
It is not so aesthetically beautiful.
How can I reach the same idea without an extra message to the object [send~]?

Sincerely,
prko


September 17, 2009 | 5:48 pm
Quote:
How can I reach the same idea without an extra message to the object [send~]?

The sprintf object could contain the set message.

_
johan


September 17, 2009 | 6:08 pm

thank you.

I have one more question.
Why do I hear a looped samples, when I turn off this patch (one instance of poly~) by the message "mute 1 §1"?


Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)