any correction for this patch?

Sep 17, 2009 at 4:13pm

any correction for this patch?

Dear advanced users,

I am not sure, the following patch is programmed in the most compact logic.
Can anybody give me an advice?

Sincerely,
prko

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –
#45490
Sep 17, 2009 at 4:32pm
prko wrote on Thu, 17 September 2009 09:13
Dear advanced users,

I am not sure, the following patch is programmed in the most compact logic.
Can anybody give me an advice?

It makes sense to me. Does it work?

mz

#164005
Sep 17, 2009 at 4:41pm

It does work.
I want to just know, if one can see the name that is created automatically in the object [send~].
In my patch, I have an extra message box, in order to display the name which is automatically created.
It is not so aesthetically beautiful.
How can I reach the same idea without an extra message to the object [send~]?

Sincerely,
prko

#164006
Sep 17, 2009 at 5:48pm
Quote:
How can I reach the same idea without an extra message to the object [send~]?

The sprintf object could contain the set message.

_
johan

#164007
Sep 17, 2009 at 6:08pm

thank you.

I have one more question.
Why do I hear a looped samples, when I turn off this patch (one instance of poly~) by the message “mute 1 §1″?

#164008

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.