ethan

I don't know if my last topic went through. I really need help with building an arpeggiator. I've tried and I'm having a bit of trouble as this is new to me. Could I perhaps have an example patch of a simple arpeggiator so I can research and understand what's required. I'd really appreciate it.

I don't know if my last topic went through. I really need help with building an arpeggiator. I've tried and I'm having a bit of trouble as this is new to me. Could I perhaps have an example patch of a simple arpeggiator so I can research and  understand what's required. I'd really appreciate it.

arpeggiator-3

you must be a bit more patient with the forums. all posts are manually checked by longhaired pink gremlins after you press "submit", and so it can take up to 25 seconds until your post appears.

unless the gremlins think that your question was too vaguely, then it might not come through at all. (if you take that into account it is a true wonder that your post came through)

[del 0] [del 200] [del 400] [del 800] [del 1000]

but there are hundred other possible approaches.

you must be a bit more patient with the forums. all posts are manually checked by longhaired pink gremlins after you press "submit", and so it can take up to 25 seconds until your post appears. 

"60"
|
[t i i i i i]
|||||
[+ 0] [+ 12] [+ 19] [+ 0] [+ 24]
|||||
[del 0] [del 200] [del 400] [del 800] [del 1000]
|||||
[append 127 250.]
|
[noteout]

Yeah, I was told that it wouldn't take too long, but after a few hours I saw that it wasn't on the forum and thought maybe it was rejected. I guess I was very vague in my topic. Thanks though! I really appreciate it, I'll just take a look at as many as I get to see the different methods of building and arpeggiator patch. I really appreciate it

The suggested solution has a bug. The del object delays only bangs, not ints.

Oh, and you can perhaps omit the [del 0] completely ;)

While we're on the topic, does a clockable "pipe" exist? I'd find that extremely useful.

edit: and I don't mean [bucket] - I mean, like, "in 120 ticks, do (message)"

While we're on the topic, does a clockable "pipe" exist? I'd find that extremely useful.
edit: and I don't mean [bucket] - I mean, like, "in 120 ticks, do (message)"


You can write [pipe @delaytime 120 ticks], or send ‘120 ticks‘ to the right inlet.

But it works only if transport is running.

You can write [pipe @delaytime 120 ticks], or send ‘120 ticks‘ to the right inlet.
But it works only if transport is running.


yeah, but is it actually clockable? Like, if I send something to that pipe and stop clocking the transport, will the message sit there until it's received those ticks?

Arpeggiator