I’m only banging the movies once to load them into the videoplane. The images are small, < =2K, 600x100. Even if i don't load the images and just put up the empty videoplanes it slays the processor. (late-2011 Macbook Pro and 12-core XEON Mac Pro).

Based on the ability to place 150+ videoplanes showing my webcam (jit.gl.grab) in another patcher (can’t find the post, now, but it is a ‘time machine’ of randomly placed videoplanes) I thought this would work no problem, but I’m really struggling.

I tried Slabs outside of javascript with just 4 videoplanes and it didn’t make an appreciable difference. Since I’m not play a movie, I’m not sure it would anyway.

Here’s the javascript I’m using to load the array. Is there anything I can do to make this perform better?

function initSpiral() {
	for (i=0; i(png_file.length-1)) { j=0; }

		pngqt.matrixcalc(png_matrix[i],png_matrix[i]);
		vplane[i].jit_matrix(png_matrix[i].name);
	}
}

I’ll also attach the patcher, javascript and PNGs to see it in context. It’s stripped down – it doesn’t have the drawing part, rather this one just loads 7 drawings over and over to fill the array for now.

The number of drawings to use is set in the javascript. I lowered it to 10 for the moment, but it needs to be at more like 100+

DRAWING_COUNT=10;

I had tried texturing jit.gl.gridshapes a while back, but was having trouble with the transparency I think. It seemed like videoplanes were the way to go, but maybe not?

Thanks for any help!
Andrew

simply leave the dim attributes on the gl.videoplanes to their default values, and your patch performs fine over here.

Thanks again!