FRid

I'm almost too embarrassed to even ask this but what exactly is going on in my patch (i.e. why is the pix-output "blurred"?)

basic-pix-sample-blurring-output

weird!... i don't know !... Using [norm] instead of [cell]/[dim] gives a similar result

While I can't explain it, here is a workaround:

In gen there is 2 sampling operators "sample" and "nearest" .

The "sample" operator samples values from a matrix using linear interpolation .

The "nearest" operator will simply grab the value from the closest cell .

So maybe if you use "nearest" rather than "sample" ....

Hi,
In gen there is 2 sampling operators "sample" and "nearest" .
The "sample" operator samples values from a matrix using linear interpolation .
The "nearest" operator will simply grab the value from the closest cell .

[nearest] gives errors too... and that is even if the input matrix is 5*5 ...

[nearest] gives errors too... and that is even if the input matrix is 5*5 ...
probably rounding errors ?


Much clearer now. Never really touched "nearest" before because of the ambiguous name. I really hope cycling will get (proper) documentation done for gen because the little grey things arent really working for me.

hah, errors using [nearest] with [cell][/][dim] but not with [norm] indeed. So probably rounding errors when using [cell][/][dim] !

[Basic Pix] "Sample" blurring output