Cycling 74 » Topic: Convolution in Gen~? http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/feed Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:16:36 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4 http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-59886 <![CDATA[Convolution in Gen~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-59886 Tue, 08 Nov 2011 03:35:23 +0000 wade Just out of curiousity, has anyone built a convolution filter in gen~? There’s nothing in the Examples folder with Max 6, but it seems like the perfect tool to use for heavy-duty sample work like this.

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215608 <![CDATA[Re: Convolution in Gen~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215608 Tue, 08 Nov 2011 07:07:43 +0000 Gregory Taylor Have at it, Wade. It’s all yours!

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215609 <![CDATA[Re: Convolution in Gen~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215609 Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:37:39 +0000 Christopher Dobrian buffir~ does this, but you could certainly build a custom-tailored one in gen~.

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215610 <![CDATA[Re: Convolution in Gen~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215610 Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:12:00 +0000 wade @Christopher Dobrian: Yes, I’ve built one using pfft~, etc. But gen~ would be way more powerful and probably better sounding because of how much more efficient it is. Working at the sample-level is ideal for convolution so I thought gen~ would be perfect.

@Gregory Taylor: Thanks! :)

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215611 <![CDATA[Re: Convolution in Gen~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215611 Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:58:42 +0000 Deftoner Any news here? Would be very interested in that too!

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215612 <![CDATA[Re: Convolution in Gen~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215612 Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:18:18 +0000 Anthony Palomba I am interested in this as well. Please keep us posted.

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215613 <![CDATA[Re: Convolution in Gen~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215613 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:23:47 +0000 Rodrigo I’m interested as well!

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215614 <![CDATA[Re: Convolution in Gen~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215614 Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:52:10 +0000 Ben Carey sound great – will keep an eye on this!

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215615 <![CDATA[Re: Convolution in Gen~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215615 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 03:12:27 +0000 TConnors Any progress on a convolution filter in gen~ ?

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215616 <![CDATA[Re: Convolution in Gen~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215616 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:35:43 +0000 Pierre Alexandre Tremblay Sorry to be thick, but why would anyone need a convolution kernel in Gen~… I can think of theoretical reasons, but in practice, what cannot be done outside with multiconvolve~ or buffir~?

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215617 <![CDATA[Re: Convolution in Gen~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215617 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:52:03 +0000 oli larkin can’t think of many reasons but one that I’ve encountered was putting an FIR filter in a feedback circuit, minimizing any additional delay.

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215618 <![CDATA[Re: Convolution in Gen~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215618 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:18:14 +0000 oli larkin since buffer/sample data is not currently accesible within genexpr functions or while loops, doing a buffir style convolution in gen~ is pretty tough i think. I suppose you could do it outside genexpr with delay objects, but that is going to be very laborious for anything but the smallest of FIR kernels

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215619 <![CDATA[Re: Convolution in Gen~?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/convolution-in-gen/#post-215619 Sun, 13 Jan 2013 07:33:47 +0000 Graham Wakefield See http://cycling74.com/forums/topic.php?id=44640#post-212319

]]>