create video list

May 22, 2007 at 5:36am

create video list

Hi,
I’ve made a patch to drop de video ( 2 folfer) in (2)ubumenu and use it by an Ozonic with jit crossade.But, when i use my keyboard (note in) the video take a time to play and the vifeo sometimes is not very fluid.
I know it’s a very basic patch but i don’t know how to optimise it.
I’v tryed with the jit.cellblock and i have the same pb.
Jitter is to slow.
I have an Imac intel 2 duo / 1 Go ram

Regards

Bypass

#32027
May 22, 2007 at 5:49am

Past a patch! It’s the universal language. Otherwise, it’s hard to
say what could be optimized.

wes

On 5/21/07, bypass wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I’ve made a patch to drop de video ( 2 folfer) in (2)ubumenu and use it by an Ozonic with jit crossade.But, when i use my keyboard (note in) the video take a time to play and the vifeo sometimes is not very fluid.
> I know it’s a very basic patch but i don’t know how to optimise it.
> I’v tryed with the jit.cellblock and i have the same pb.
> Jitter is to slow.
> I have an Imac intel 2 duo / 1 Go ram
>
> Regards
>
> Bypass
>

#104699
May 22, 2007 at 8:25am

#104700
May 25, 2007 at 10:33am

Hi

Two basic things I am doing to get fluid video.

I use photoJPEG format at 640×480
I use a [loadram] message to force the file into ram.

I can zip around to different loop points changing rate direction as I go with nearly no glitches.

If you are compositing then look into jit.videoplane. This will work directly on your GPU and save you some cycles for doing other things.

Carl

#104701
May 25, 2007 at 3:08pm

even better than polymovie is the js movie bank example in jitter-exmaples/javascript.

#104702
May 25, 2007 at 3:23pm

even better is the java polyMovieBank in jitter-examplesjava.
anyone got to add threading support for it?

On 5/25/07, pnyboer

wrote:
>
>
> even better than polymovie is the js movie bank example in
> jitter-exmaples/javascript.
>
>
> –
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> The Lifespan
> 2 oz brandy
> 1/2 oz orgeat
> 1/2 oz maraschino
> 3/4 oz mix of (meyer) lemon and (yellow) grapefruit juice
> Shake with ice and serve in a Pernod-rinsed cocktail glass
>

#104703
May 25, 2007 at 3:38pm

I would love to know the answer to that. Ive been planning on looking
into how hard that would be, but im scared. so so scared :D

On May 25, 2007, at 11:23 AM, yair reshef wrote:

> even better is the java polyMovieBank in jitter-examplesjava.
> anyone got to add threading support for it?
>
> On 5/25/07, pnyboer < pnyboer@slambassador.com> wrote:
>
> even better than polymovie is the js movie bank example in jitter-
> exmaples/javascript.
>
>
> –
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> The Lifespan
> 2 oz brandy
> 1/2 oz orgeat
> 1/2 oz maraschino
> 3/4 oz mix of (meyer) lemon and (yellow) grapefruit juice
> Shake with ice and serve in a Pernod-rinsed cocktail glass
>

v a d e //

http://www.vade.info
abstrakt.vade.info

#104704
May 25, 2007 at 3:56pm

We started working on a threaded java moviebank here, and managed to
get a working test that doesn’t crash… the method to bring the the
threaded movies back onto the ‘common thread’ (opengl wants to all be
on the same thread for display) was to bring the output into a matrix
first.

I didn’t really see a performance gain, but i also couldn’t test it
properly — anyone with a macpro care to test this with some high-res
or many movies playing?

its a very basic java class that has stripped away all the
functionality except for loading a playing one movie (ie its not a
‘bank’ right now — testing is through multiple instances) we could
be totally barking up the wrong tree so any advice from java folk is
appreciated as well.

http://node.net/dek/ThreadedMovie.zip

deKam

> I would love to know the answer to that. Ive been planning on
> looking into how hard that would be, but im scared. so so scared :D
>
> On May 25, 2007, at 11:23 AM, yair reshef wrote:
>
>> even better is the java polyMovieBank in jitter-examplesjava.
>> anyone got to add threading support for it?
>>
>> On 5/25/07, pnyboer < pnyboer@slambassador.com> wrote:
>>
>> even better than polymovie is the js movie bank example in jitter-
>> exmaples/javascript.

#104705
May 25, 2007 at 6:56pm

Thanks. Im definitely going to test this out. No source ?

On May 25, 2007, at 11:56 AM, dekam wrote:

> We started working on a threaded java moviebank here, and managed
> to get a working test that doesn’t crash… the method to bring the
> the threaded movies back onto the ‘common thread’ (opengl wants to
> all be on the same thread for display) was to bring the output into
> a matrix first.
>
> I didn’t really see a performance gain, but i also couldn’t test it
> properly — anyone with a macpro care to test this with some high-
> res or many movies playing?
>
> its a very basic java class that has stripped away all the
> functionality except for loading a playing one movie (ie its not a
> ‘bank’ right now — testing is through multiple instances) we
> could be totally barking up the wrong tree so any advice from java
> folk is appreciated as well.
>
> http://node.net/dek/ThreadedMovie.zip
>
> deKam
>
>
>
>> I would love to know the answer to that. Ive been planning on
>> looking into how hard that would be, but im scared. so so scared :D
>>
>> On May 25, 2007, at 11:23 AM, yair reshef wrote:
>>
>>> even better is the java polyMovieBank in jitter-examplesjava.
>>> anyone got to add threading support for it?
>>>
>>> On 5/25/07, pnyboer < pnyboer@slambassador.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> even better than polymovie is the js movie bank example in jitter-
>>> exmaples/javascript.
>

v a d e //

http://www.vade.info
abstrakt.vade.info

#104706
May 25, 2007 at 8:12pm

On May 25, 2007, at 11:56 AM, vade wrote:

> Thanks. Im definitely going to test this out. No source ?

FWIW, for interested mxj developers, the viewsource command will use
the jode decompiler to generate the source. Unless the developer has
specifically used obfuscation software, this is pretty readable.

-Joshua

#104707
May 25, 2007 at 8:32pm

oh. thats actually pretty handy!

thanks!

:)

On May 25, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Joshua Kit Clayton wrote:

>
> On May 25, 2007, at 11:56 AM, vade wrote:
>
>> Thanks. Im definitely going to test this out. No source ?
>
> FWIW, for interested mxj developers, the viewsource command will
> use the jode decompiler to generate the source. Unless the
> developer has specifically used obfuscation software, this is
> pretty readable.
>

v a d e //

http://www.vade.info
abstrakt.vade.info

#104708

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.