chthonic

I have been looking at tutorial number 26 on building a phase vocoder. It requires that you record the FFT analysis into a buffer~ object so that it can be played back at varying speeds without changing the pitch. It takes the length that the sound segment would take to play to convert it into this buffer which allows it to be manipulated by the phase vocoder. I was wondering if there is a way that one could record files extremely quickly into buffer~s so, for example, one could select a segment of audio and time stretch it on the fly?

creating-buffers-faster-than-sampling-rate

> I have been looking at tutorial number 26 on building a phase

> vocoder. It requires that you record the FFT analysis into a buffer~

> object so that it can be played back at varying speeds without

> changing the pitch. It takes the length that the sound segment would

> take to play to convert it into this buffer which allows it to be

> manipulated by the phase vocoder. I was wondering if there is a way

> that one could record files extremely quickly into buffer~s so, for

> example, one could select a segment of audio and time stretch it on

The answer to the subject would be no way... but your question is 

You can easily access a buffer~ while you record into it. You could also 

setup several buffer~s to switch between... (But switching would be in 

Nicholas Esterer schrieb:
> I have been looking at tutorial number 26 on building a phase
> vocoder. It requires that you record the FFT analysis into a buffer~
> object so that it can be played back at varying speeds without
> changing the pitch. It takes the length that the sound segment would
> take to play to convert it into this buffer which allows it to be
> manipulated by the phase vocoder. I was wondering if there is a way
> that one could record files extremely quickly into buffer~s so, for
> example, one could select a segment of audio and time stretch it on
> the fly?

The answer to the subject would be no way... but your question is 
actually a different one...
You can easily access a buffer~ while you record into it. You could also 
setup several buffer~s to switch between... (But switching would be in 
the scheduler which should be fine...)

-- 
Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
--_____-----------|--------------
--(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
-- _|_)----|-----()--------------
----------()--------www.ccmix.com


But would there be considerable latency using this technique?

> But would there be considerable latency using this technique?

Nicholas Esterer schrieb:
> But would there be considerable latency using this technique?

Creating Buffers Faster Than Sampling Rate