i’ve got the same error in my copy too– and it certainly would not be an intended signal path
Are you questioning the existence of two signals at the left inlet? Sorry for noise if I missed the point.
Operators accept a list pair AFAIK
It’s been there since Max5. Whoever transferred this patch from Max4 to Max5, fucked up. Oh wait, I was the one who transferred most of the examples from Max4 to Max5(Cycling74 needed every example recreated object by object for proper databasing of the new patcher format)… But I definitely didn’t do this one, because anyone can tell: the examples i transferred all have obsessively segmented and neatly arranged patch chords. This one, on the other hand, looks like a pile of puke.
Ah, the idiosyncratic beauties of a product mainly developed off of cheap contract work :)
@n00b: 1) yes 2) you missed the point ;-) I see no lists here.
@brave_cycling74_team: what do you do with this discovery? every second fft frame imaginary part zeroed also sounds interesting (adds some flutter; and it can’t be (easily?) done with pfft), but then all comments about classical cross-synthesis (scaling magnitudes of sig.A by magnitudes of sig.B) are misleading.
Thanks this has been fixed for the next incremental.
C74 RSS Feed | © Copyright Cycling '74