dumpout

Jan 8, 2007 at 2:30pm

dumpout

Where is it ?

max v2;
#N vpatcher 10 59 610 459;
#P window setfont “Sans Serif” 9.;
#P message 174 265 50 196617;
#P window linecount 1;
#P newex 174 236 62 196617 prepend set;
#P message 174 81 33 196617 dump;
#P user jit.cellblock 174 110 292 228 3 9 5 10 45 17 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
1 0 0 0 255 255 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 191 191 191 0 0 0 215 215 240 1 1 1 0
4 0 0 0;
#P connect 1 0 0 0;
#P connect 0 0 2 0;
#P connect 2 0 3 0;
#P pop;

It would be great if, as was with version Max 4.5, there was a file
called “WhatsNewInMaxMSP462.pdf”
Remember this programmingenviroment is used to teach students
programming !
DO_Ray

#29555
Jan 8, 2007 at 3:28pm
#92615
Jan 8, 2007 at 6:47pm

I should make it more clear that lately there is no WORD dumpout in
front of (colum,row and value).

This leads to reprogramming my patches if they ever come in active
service again.
needless to say one can not build a library of subpatches if you can
not trust it will function after an update.

For clearity i give a excerpt where i used route to differ a signal

max v2;
#N vpatcher 10 59 610 459;
#P window setfont “Sans Serif” 9.;
#P window linecount 1;
#P message 136 301 89 196617 dumpout 0 0 Hee;
#P newex 136 277 62 196617 prepend set;
#P message 229 324 50 196617 0 0 Hee;
#P newex 229 300 62 196617 prepend set;
#P newex 229 274 74 196617 route dumpout;
#P message 265 120 33 196617 dump;
#P message 200 120 61 196617 set 0 0 Hoo;
#P message 136 120 61 196617 set 0 0 Hee;
#P user jit.cellblock 136 146 254 264 3 9 5 10 45 17 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
1 0 0 0 255 255 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 191 191 191 0 0 0 215 215 240 1 1 1 0
4 0 0 0;
#P connect 3 0 0 0;
#P connect 1 0 0 0;
#P connect 2 0 0 0;
#P connect 0 0 7 0;
#P connect 7 0 8 0;
#P connect 0 0 4 0;
#P connect 4 0 5 0;
#P connect 5 0 6 0;
#P pop;

#92616
Jan 8, 2007 at 8:27pm

Thanks for the note.

We’ll have a look at it. I’ll let this thread know if there’s an incremental update posted.

-A

#92617
Jan 10, 2007 at 10:11am

All right !

Hope it will be an easy fix,
thanks

DO_Ray

On 8 Jan 2007, at 21:27, Andrew Pask wrote:

>
>
>
> Thanks for the note.
>
> We’ll have a look at it. I’ll let this thread know if there’s an
> incremental update posted.
>
> -A

#92618

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.