easier way to join these?

Dec 23, 2010 at 8:55pm

easier way to join these?

couldn’t find a single object that could replace the 3 [zl join]. anybody know of one? some kind of join for x number of inputs, like pack – but able to accept a list with arbitrary length through one of its inlets.

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –
#53829
Dec 23, 2010 at 9:15pm

sprintf or combine

#193757
Dec 23, 2010 at 9:18pm

[pack] and [pak] DO accept list input in any inlet, just try it.

-110

edit: oh nevermind, i didnt see the “arbitrary”.

#193758
Dec 24, 2010 at 12:32am

can’t you put them all into [zl group] and bang the whole list out when you’re done?

#193759
Dec 24, 2010 at 9:06pm

when i send a list to sprintf, combine, or pack, they just cut the first item from the list and stick it in the output list.

oh well, thought i had to put all that together for forward, but i just read you can send the “send x” message and the data at separate times.

#193760
Dec 27, 2010 at 11:14am
– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –
#193761

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.