Cycling 74 » Topic: fast way http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/fast-way/feed Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:13:37 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4 http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/fast-way/#post-40700 <![CDATA[fast way]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/fast-way/#post-40700 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:51:07 +0000 ATH is there a faster way to extract a line out of a video matrix than with sourcedim and dest dim and a counter?
(A counter needs with metronom set to 1 and Matrix 620 Pixel – 620ms wich is not fast enough for my purposes.)

Thank for hints

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/fast-way/#post-144234 <![CDATA[Re: fast way]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/fast-way/#post-144234 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:00:56 +0000 joshua goldberg try jit.scanwrap in spew mode.

On Nov 6, 2008, at 5:51 AM, ATH wrote:

>
> is there a faster way to extract a line out of a video matrix than
> with sourcedim and dest dim and a counter?
> (A counter needs with metronom set to 1 and Matrix 620 Pixel – 620ms
> wich is not fast enough for my purposes.)
>
> Thank for hints
>
>
>

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/fast-way/#post-144235 <![CDATA[Re: fast way]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/fast-way/#post-144235 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:07:32 +0000 joshua goldberg actually, i can be more helpful if you provide context.

On Nov 6, 2008, at 9:00 AM, joshua goldberg wrote:

> try jit.scanwrap in spew mode.
>
> On Nov 6, 2008, at 5:51 AM, ATH wrote:
>
>>
>> is there a faster way to extract a line out of a video matrix than
>> with sourcedim and dest dim and a counter?
>> (A counter needs with metronom set to 1 and Matrix 620 Pixel –
>> 620ms wich is not fast enough for my purposes.)
>>
>> Thank for hints
>>
>>
>>
>

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/fast-way/#post-144236 <![CDATA[Re: fast way]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/fast-way/#post-144236 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:40:21 +0000 ATH Thanks a lot. I tried it this way:
would that be correct too? (just step through the presets 1-4 to see my approach.
kind regards
ath

]]>