<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: Feedback Problem in Bandpass-Setting</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/feedback-problem-in-bandpass-setting/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/feedback-problem-in-bandpass-setting/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/feedback-problem-in-bandpass-setting/#post-24506</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Feedback Problem in Bandpass-Setting]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/feedback-problem-in-bandpass-setting/#post-24506</link>
					<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>titus bellwald</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Hi list,<br />
i have quite a problem:<br />
Im working on a piece, where i use a bank of bandpass filters (four <br />
parallel cascades of two biquads at gain 1 and Q bout 15 on every one <br />
of the four input channels) to loosely imitate the resonances of an <br />
instrument. The output of the filter should then be reverbed a lot to <br />
generate a cloud of airy sound. Here seems to be the problem: Reverbing <br />
the filteroutput more or less amplifies it, as it is present over <br />
longer a time and gets accumulated. Thus the whole thing is extremely <br />
prone to feeding back into the filter&#8230;<br />
I&#8217;ve tried building feedbackdestroyers with fft, but when those shut <br />
enough to kill the feedback, i cant get anything else past them into <br />
the filter. i&#8217;ve tried working on the reverb settings (used newverb) as <br />
well, but when i got the feedback under control, the reverb level was <br />
almost impercrptible over the direct sound from the instruments &#8211; <br />
timpani i forgot to mention&#8230;<br />
Could it just be a problem of the very unfavorable accoustics of the <br />
room in which i&#8217; m working, &#8211; its small and the instruments are in a <br />
corner, so i get a lot of reflection from the walls and the ceiling, <br />
and the huge membranes reflect everythig into the mics. Its not just a <br />
problem of the newverb, if tried other devices as well&#8230;<br />
Any ideas how to get a sort of tuneable resonator/filter bank without <br />
the self exitation problem?<br />
i&#8217;ll try to get an isolated patch without any externals missing for <br />
posting&#8230;</p>
<p>Titus Bellwald</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/feedback-problem-in-bandpass-setting/#post-70991</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Feedback Problem in Bandpass-Setting]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/feedback-problem-in-bandpass-setting/#post-70991</link>
					<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Peter McCulloch</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Something you might try is doubling the number of filters, and reducing <br />
the Q.  This will make them be less prone to ringing. Also, since <br />
you&#8217;re using the reverb to amplify the filters, you might also try <br />
reducing the gain.</p>
<p>i.e.</p>
<p>input<br />
|<br />
reson~ 1. 400. 7.5<br />
|<br />
reson~ 1. 400. 7.5<br />
|<br />
output</p>
<p>Also, have you considering routing the audio in the opposite manner <br />
(reverb, then EQ)?  Depends on how you&#8217;re using it, so this might not <br />
work stylistically&#8230;</p>
<p>Additionally, I&#8217;d consider a compressor/limiter on the input and output <br />
stages to manage volume levels.</p>
<p>Peter McCulloch</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/feedback-problem-in-bandpass-setting/#post-70992</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Feedback Problem in Bandpass-Setting]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/feedback-problem-in-bandpass-setting/#post-70992</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 07:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Trond Lossius</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I&#8217;m not fully sure what you are doing, but I get the impression that  <br />
you are micing the timpani, processing and then play back using  <br />
loudspeakers. If so, the first thing I would consider is the distance  <br />
and position of mic and loudspeakers, and also what kind of mics you  <br />
are using. Sorry if these suggestions are to basic.</p>
<p>Another thing to try is to let the center frequency of the filters  <br />
drift a little bit. This might prevent them from being triggered at  <br />
the exact same frequency.</p>
<p>One more thing you could try is introducing freqshift~ to shift  <br />
frequency downward by a few Hz. This is a common way of avoiding  <br />
feedback, as any frequency that starts building up through feedback  <br />
will be pushed downward frequency-wise and hence gradually pushed  <br />
away from of the resonant frequency. It might introduce unwanted  <br />
detuning and artifacts though.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s well worth checking out if you might benefit from limiters or  <br />
compressors as well.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Trond</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/feedback-problem-in-bandpass-setting/#post-70993</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Feedback Problem in Bandpass-Setting]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/feedback-problem-in-bandpass-setting/#post-70993</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Stefan Tiedje</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Titus Bellwald wrote:<br />
> Hi list,<br />
> i have quite a problem:<br />
> Im working on a piece, where i use a bank of bandpass filters (four <br />
> parallel cascades of two biquads at gain 1 and Q bout 15 on every one of <br />
> the four input channels) to loosely imitate the resonances of an <br />
> instrument. The output of the filter should then be reverbed a lot to <br />
> generate a cloud of airy sound.</p>
<p>You might consider to combine the two things. As the resonance of an <br />
instrument is in general a simplified reverb, you could build the reverb <br />
from scratch and ignore the main problem of reverbs, the avoidance of <br />
resonances. Thus its easier to build (less delay lines) and you get your <br />
resonances as well. It requires some math to find the reflection length <br />
aka delay times to get your resonances. You could still put some filters <br />
into the feedback, but these could be simple onepole~s.</p>
<p>Just a suggestion&#8230;</p>
<p>Stefan</p>
<p>
&#8211; </p>
<p>  [][]  [][][]  [][]  [][][]<br />
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]</p>
<p>         Stefan Tiedje<br />
         Klanggestalter<br />
     Electronic Composition<br />
               &#038;<br />
         Improvisation</p>
<p>            /~~~~~<br />
     \   /|() ()|<br />
     ))))) )|  |  |( \<br />
     ///     _/)/ )))))<br />
             ___/   ///</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-x&#8212;-<br />
&#8211;_____&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;|&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8211;(_|_ &#8212;-|&#8212;&#8211;|&#8212;&#8211;()&#8212;-<br />
&#8211; _|_)&#8212;-|&#8212;&#8211;()&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-()&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;x&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>14, Av. Pr. Franklin Roosevelt,<br />
94320 Thiais, France<br />
Phone at CCMIX +33-1-49 77 51 72</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

