Thijs Koerselman

Hi, I converted a patch to js, and encountered 2 problems.

2. jit.repos "offset_x" seems to be off by 1

The patch works fine, problems occur when converting to js. See the attached

1. jit.glue doesn't seem to work
2. jit.repos "offset_x" seems to be off by 1

The patch works fine, problems occur when converting to js. See the attached
patch to reproduce.

glue-repos-bugs

Use jit.matrix src/dst dim. It's the way to go in scripting.

> 2. jit.repos "offset_x" seems to be off by 1

Use jit.matrix src/dst dim.  It's the way to go in scripting.

Thanks Wesley, I'll try it out. That means jit.glue is not supported at all?

Anyways there is patch on the way, but it has to be approved first by the

moderator because it was too big. The off by one error will be obvious in my

> Use jit.matrix src/dst dim. It's the way to go in scripting.

> > 2. jit.repos "offset_x" seems to be off by 1

Thanks Wesley, I'll try it out. That means jit.glue is not supported at all?
Anyways there is patch on the way, but it has to be approved first by the
moderator because it was too big. The off by one error will be obvious in my
patch.

On 10/25/06, Wesley Smith  wrote:
>
> > 1. jit.glue doesn't seem to work
>
> Use jit.matrix src/dst dim.  It's the way to go in scripting.
>
>
> > 2. jit.repos "offset_x" seems to be off by 1
>
> Not sure about this one.
>
> wes
>

> Thanks Wesley, I'll try it out. That means jit.glue is not supported at all?

> Anyways there is patch on the way, but it has to be approved first by the

> moderator because it was too big. The off by one error will be obvious in my

> > Use jit.matrix src/dst dim. It's the way to go in scripting.

> > > 2. jit.repos "offset_x" seems to be off by 1

On 10/25/06, Thijs Koerselman  wrote:
> Thanks Wesley, I'll try it out. That means jit.glue is not supported at all?
> Anyways there is patch on the way, but it has to be approved first by the
> moderator because it was too big. The off by one error will be obvious in my
> patch.
>
> best, -thijs
>
>
>
> On 10/25/06, Wesley Smith  wrote:
> >
> > > 1. jit.glue doesn't seem to work
> >
> > Use jit.matrix src/dst dim.  It's the way to go in scripting.
> >
> >
> > > 2. jit.repos "offset_x" seems to be off by 1
> >
> > Not sure about this one.
> >
> > wes
> >
>
>
>
>
>


yes in a regular max patcher it is. My patch just shows a difference of 1

between a regular jit.repos patch and a js instantiated version.

On 10/25/06, Wesley Smith  wrote:
>
> Seems fine to me.

yes in a regular max patcher it is. My patch just shows a difference of 1
between a regular jit.repos patch and a  js instantiated version.

That would be mighty strange because the JS and patcher versions of

all jitter objects use the exact same code ujnder the hood. Do you

> yes in a regular max patcher it is. My patch just shows a difference of 1

> between a regular jit.repos patch and a js instantiated version.

That would be mighty strange because the JS and patcher versions of
all jitter objects use the exact same code ujnder the hood.  Do you
have a small JS example?

On 10/25/06, Thijs Koerselman  wrote:
>
> On 10/25/06, Wesley Smith  wrote:
> > Seems fine to me.
>
> yes in a regular max patcher it is. My patch just shows a difference of 1
> between a regular jit.repos patch and a  js instantiated version.
>
> -thijs
>
>
>
>
>
>


> That would be mighty strange because the JS and patcher versions of

> all jitter objects use the exact same code ujnder the hood. Do you

hmm I guess it must be something else then... will cook up an example

tomorrow, maybe the original attachment will arrive before.

On 10/25/06, Wesley Smith  wrote:
>
> That would be mighty strange because the JS and patcher versions of
> all jitter objects use the exact same code ujnder the hood.  Do you
> have a small JS example?

hmm I guess it must be something else then... will cook up an example
tomorrow, maybe the original attachment will arrive before.

glue + repos bugs