fiat.g@wanadoo.fr

Can we use the GLUT library OpenGl with Jitter?

glut-with-jitter

Jitter already does everything GLUT does. To what end do you want

GLUT? It's basically an OS abstraction library for developing

> Can we use the GLUT library OpenGl with Jitter?

Jitter already does everything GLUT does.  To what end do you want
GLUT?  It's basically an OS abstraction library for developing
xplatform opengl apps.

On 3/13/07, tenshi  wrote:
>
> Can we use the GLUT library OpenGl with Jitter?
>


What about mxj and JOGL? complex calls and full access to the APIs in 

Something you can do with gl.lua, but it's still in beta, isn't it?

> Jitter already does everything GLUT does.

> GLUT? It's basically an OS abstraction library for developing

>> Can we use the GLUT library OpenGl with Jitter?

What about mxj and JOGL? complex calls and full access to the APIs in 
the OpenGL 2.0 world.
Something you can do with gl.lua, but it's still in beta, isn't it?

Wesley Smith wrote:
> Jitter already does everything GLUT does.

>  To what end do you want
> GLUT?  It's basically an OS abstraction library for developing
> xplatform opengl apps.
>
> wes
>
> On 3/13/07, tenshi  wrote:
>
>>
>> Can we use the GLUT library OpenGl with Jitter?
>>
>
>

I've never used JOGL, but you can most likely use it in an mxj. As

for gl.lua's beta status, it's actually quite stable and is still beta

so that it can be changed if needed without causing uproar. It only

supports up to opengl 1.5 because opengl 20. basically consists of

shaders, mesh, and texture extensions which are fully supported by

jitter objects in a very clean way so there was no need to duplicate

> What about mxj and JOGL? complex calls and full access to the APIs in

> Something you can do with gl.lua, but it's still in beta, isn't it?

> > Jitter already does everything GLUT does.

> > GLUT? It's basically an OS abstraction library for developing

> >> Can we use the GLUT library OpenGl with Jitter?

I've never used JOGL, but you can most likely use it in an mxj.  As
for gl.lua's beta status, it's actually quite stable and is still beta
so that it can be changed if needed without causing uproar.  It only
supports up to opengl 1.5 because opengl 20. basically consists of
shaders, mesh, and texture extensions which are fully supported by
jitter objects in a very clean way so there was no need to duplicate
that functionality.

On 3/14/07, marco lorenzin  wrote:
>
> What about mxj and JOGL? complex calls and full access to the APIs in
> the OpenGL 2.0 world.
> Something you can do with gl.lua, but it's still in beta, isn't it?
>
> Marco
>
> ---
>
> Wesley Smith wrote:
> > Jitter already does everything GLUT does.
>
>
> >  To what end do you want
> > GLUT?  It's basically an OS abstraction library for developing
> > xplatform opengl apps.
> >
> > wes
> >
> > On 3/13/07, tenshi  wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Can we use the GLUT library OpenGl with Jitter?
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>


GLUT with Jitter?