Forums > Jitter

how to [gate] a matrix?

April 14, 2014 | 8:09 am

i´d like to replace some of my older jitter "gates" abstractions with my regular messages gates abstractions, which means i am packing the incoming matrix with e.g. [prepend video] and then use different objects such as [gate] or [route] to switch output or to switch between different inputs to the abstraction, as opposed to utilizing jit.crossfade or jit.alphablend.

in many situations now unwanted frames do appear when i modulate such "gates".

example: say i am using [switch] and change its argument (by sending 1 to switch so that a different source is been passed through). in about 50% of the cases there is one unwanted frame now on the output, and that even in a situation where the origin of the frames of both matrixes is the same metro …

i believe that my problem is caused mostly in my mind, because i just cant stop thinking in right-to-left order when working with video. but isnt there a general trick how to solve this?

-110


April 14, 2014 | 2:34 pm

difficult to help without patch, but right to left order should apply too
ie, the last received matrix will be the one displayed


April 14, 2014 | 10:58 pm

How about [selector] within jit.gen? Very simple to implement. It was designed as a switch object for matrices. Are you able to run Gen on your machine?

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

April 16, 2014 | 2:17 pm

jit.gen is a good idea which i will keep in my mind, but of course i´d prefer a solution which would work on older systems, too. first step is to reuse my existing max gates.

will post a simplified example patch tomorrow.


April 16, 2014 | 2:20 pm

Can you post an example that generates those unwanted frames?


April 16, 2014 | 2:45 pm

i dont have max here now.

basically i do stuff like this:

metro 200

jit.qt.movie 400 200 jit.qt.movie 400 200 (use still images for this test)

prepend video prepend video

gate gate (controlled by a toggle, one of them with reversed order of 0 and 1)

route video

jit.pwindow

for me this flickers, and about every other time i press the toggle, one wrong (or black/emtpy) frame appears. this remains like it is even when you put a [del 0] behind the toggle and turn overdrive on.


April 16, 2014 | 2:49 pm

i must be not seeing something very obvious.


April 16, 2014 | 5:40 pm

no problems here… at least not with this:

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

April 17, 2014 | 4:43 am

what if you use two different "route video" and then use a op+ or something?


April 18, 2014 | 1:59 pm
– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

April 20, 2014 | 1:37 pm

@metamax: i can no longer reproduce the problem. no idea what went wrong.


April 20, 2014 | 1:55 pm

Sounds like you have no idea what went right. Not such a bad place to be. :)


Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)