Rodrigo

I'm going back and declicking the bejesus out of my performance patch, and for this section I'd like to remove the [+~ 1] object, and just have the hanning window go from 1, to 0, and back to 1.

Originally I had "fill 1, apply hanning" and used a [!-~ 1] instead, but that's still needlessly crunching msp numbers.

Here's the main section of the patch (in my version I have the window time much smaller (8ms for line~ and 4ms for pipe), this is longer so it's easier to see.

I'm going back and declicking the bejesus out of my performance patch, and for this section I'd like to remove the [+~ 1] object, and just have the hanning window go from 1, to 0, and back to 1. 

Originally I had "fill 1, apply hanning" and used a [!-~ 1] instead, but that's still needlessly crunching msp numbers. 

how-to-peek-an-inverted-hanning-window-declicking-buffer-skipper

why don't you record the hanning after inverting it, so the window is already right and doesn't need to be processed?

Ah, maybe you meant that with the "peek" in the title, sorry. what about [poke~]

That's perfect! For the life of me I couldn't figure out how to write a buffer to a buffer with some math manipulation (I was trying some counter~ stuff, but couldn't get it going).

Hmm, I guess that doesn't work like I thought it would work?

I've succeeded in making a 'click only' playback engine!

there was some offset, of 1.. sample 0 was value 0.

there was some offset, of 1.. sample 0 was value 0.
cheers!


This way you can generate the envelope with peek~.

How to 'peek' an inverted hanning window? (declicking buffer skipper)