HUI protocol

Feb 14, 2007 at 3:34pm

HUI protocol

#30284
Feb 14, 2007 at 7:05pm

I’ve asked both mackie and digi for the hui protocol many times. it’s aparently top secret.

I think I’ve got a patch emulating the motor mix including the displays etc. if your interested.
-matt

#96434
Feb 14, 2007 at 9:01pm

Matthew Aidekman skrev:
> I’ve asked both mackie and digi for the hui protocol many times. it’s aparently top secret.
>
> I think I’ve got a patch emulating the motor mix including the displays etc. if your interested.
> -matt
>
*rolls eyes too* – I got the same BS about the Mackie Control back in
the day. Lo and behold, everyone just reverse engineers the MCU or googles:
http://members.aol.com/mhigrules/MCMap.htm
I have even confirmed that certain un-named software companies have
implemented Mackie Control support without even getting to first base
with Mackie – so everything’s possible.

I did a lot of the groundwork to figure out the specs for users wanting
to hack about with the midi in Ableton Live, it’s really easy once you
take a crack at it. and mackie can’t do anything to prevent that, since
it’s just basic midi. I think there’s a bit of overlap between the MCU
and the HUI, so the above link might provide a good starting point for
faders, knobs and buttons.

Best,
Andreas Wetterberg.

#96435
Feb 14, 2007 at 9:24pm

Andreas Wetterberg wrote:
> *rolls eyes too* – I got the same BS about the Mackie Control back in
> the day. Lo and behold, everyone just reverse engineers the MCU or googles:
> http://members.aol.com/mhigrules/MCMap.htm
> I have even confirmed that certain un-named software companies have
> implemented Mackie Control support without even getting to first base
> with Mackie – so everything’s possible.

I found a PDF spec of the Logic Control protocol, and it worked pretty
well with my MCU. I’ve got some MXJ code for it that I never got round
to polishing up, if it’s of any use.


Owen

#96436
Feb 14, 2007 at 9:54pm

Owen Green skrev:
> Andreas Wetterberg wrote:
>> *rolls eyes too* – I got the same BS about the Mackie Control back in
>> the day. Lo and behold, everyone just reverse engineers the MCU or
>> googles:
>> http://members.aol.com/mhigrules/MCMap.htm
>> I have even confirmed that certain un-named software companies have
>> implemented Mackie Control support without even getting to first base
>> with Mackie – so everything’s possible.
>
> I found a PDF spec of the Logic Control protocol, and it worked pretty
> well with my MCU. I’ve got some MXJ code for it that I never got round
> to polishing up, if it’s of any use.
>
That’s just it; with the above link one can simply cross-reference the
controller-/note values with the functions in the manual of a given
MCU-enabled piece of software, and you’re off. For instance (quick flip
through Ableton Live manual:)
Cursor Up – Ableton Live: Session View – Navigate up – midinote C 7
Zoom – Ableton Live:Session View – Launch currently selected Clip –
midinote D#7
etc. and so forth.

Andreas.

#96437
Feb 15, 2007 at 9:00am

#96438
Feb 27, 2007 at 4:21pm

#96439
Feb 27, 2007 at 7:28pm

hello,

apologies in advance for this mundane question; but, i’ve tried
too many different scenerios and always the jit.externals are
not being recognized by my application. am i missing something
so very obvious?

thanks,

zehn

#96440
Feb 27, 2007 at 7:53pm

#96441
Feb 27, 2007 at 8:12pm

#96442
Feb 27, 2007 at 11:47pm

#96443
Feb 28, 2007 at 12:09am

#96444
Feb 28, 2007 at 1:02am

#96445
Sep 15, 2010 at 8:23pm

i know this post is quite old, but i am doing a bit of research on the mackie HUI protocol and this thread looks like it might be useful… anyone know why most of the posts appear blank?

thanks

justin

#96446
Sep 15, 2010 at 10:01pm

they have been deleted because of rude language

#96447
Sep 16, 2010 at 11:19am

haha ok, i guess that makes sense…

maybe i’ll start a new post about this then, cos i might need more info on Mackie HUI protocol. but first, i need to look into other options.

#96448
May 12, 2011 at 2:50pm

no really i was very interested, why they have been removed? seriously….

#96449

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.