Nano59

is it possible to store more than one integer into one section of the preset object then have the integers unpacked seperately when the section is selected?

Ive tried packing all of them up and unpacking but this doesn't seem to work.

Sorry if this is a kindergarten question but i can't figure it out

is it possible to store more than one integer into one section of the preset object then have the integers unpacked seperately when the section is selected?  

Sorry if this is a kindergarten question but i can't figure it out


integers-into-preset-object

On Jul 8, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Toiletmuck wrote:

> is it possible to store more than one integer into one section of 

> the preset object then have the integers unpacked seperately when 

I'm really not sure what you're asking here. Preset will store 

anything that it knows about. If an integer number box is not 

specifically excluded, it will be stored in a preset.

Perhaps a sample patch showing where you're having problems would help.

> is it possible to store more than one integer into one section of  
> the preset object then have the integers unpacked seperately when  
> the section is selected?

I'm really not sure what you're asking here. Preset will store  
anything that it knows about. If an integer number box is not  
specifically excluded, it will be stored in a preset.

Chris Muir
cbm@well.com	
http://www.xfade.com

I hope this patch makes it a bit clearer


On Jul 8, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Toiletmuck wrote:

> I hope this patch makes it a bit clearer

You were making it much harder than it is:

On Jul 8, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Toiletmuck wrote:
> I hope this patch makes it a bit clearer

It does - that's not at all how preset works... I would go over the 

preset object help files and reference a few more times. I believe there 

are also tutorials highlighting how to use it?

Toiletmuck skrev:
> apologies
>
> I hope this patch makes it a bit clearer
>
It does - that's not at all how preset works... I would go over the 
preset object help files and reference a few more times. I believe there 
are also tutorials highlighting how to use it?

but please DO NOT NAME A PATCHER WITH A NAME OF A STANDARD OBJECT!!!

It doesn't screw my Max installation, but could kill that object for 

It is much simpler: select all of the patch, choose copy compressed from 

the edit menu, switch to your e-mail program, paste into the mail body. 

This makes it magnitudes easier for anybody who wants to help you, it 

doesn't require to save the patch to disk...

Toiletmuck schrieb:
> I hope this patch makes it a bit clearer

but please DO NOT NAME A PATCHER WITH A NAME OF A STANDARD OBJECT!!!
It doesn't screw my Max installation, but could kill that object for 
others...

It is much simpler: select all of the patch, choose copy compressed from 
the edit menu, switch to your e-mail program, paste into the mail body. 
This makes it magnitudes easier for anybody who wants to help you, it 
doesn't require to save the patch to disk...

-- 
Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
--_____-----------|--------------
--(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
-- _|_)----|-----()--------------
----------()--------www.ccmix.com


ok, ill remember that for next time. Apologies

ok, ill remember that for next time.  Apologies


I get an error now which says too many lines >1000 were posted to the max window at once, object (matrix~) output truncated.

It started after i saved a whole bunch of presets.

I get an error now which says too many lines >1000 were posted to the max window at once, object (matrix~) output truncated.  

It started after i saved a whole bunch of presets.


this patch has a problem with the matrix~ object which produces >1000 lines into the max patcher. If someone could explain why/change it, that'd be great :)

(Aknowledged that ive used parts other people have created. I just whipped it together quickly. Many thanks to those who helped)

this patch has a problem with the matrix~ object which produces >1000 lines into the max patcher.  If someone could explain why/change it, that'd be great :)

(Aknowledged that ive used parts other people have created.  I just whipped it together quickly.  Many thanks to those who helped)


You are asking matrix~ to output through 4 different outputs, but it 

> this patch has a problem with the matrix~ object which produces >1000 lines into the max patcher. If someone could explain why/change it, that'd be great :)

You are asking matrix~ to output through 4 different outputs, but it 
only has one. Change that part ;)

Toiletmuck skrev:
> this patch has a problem with the matrix~ object which produces >1000 lines into the max patcher.  If someone could explain why/change it, that'd be great :)
>
> ----------begin_max5_patcher----------


integers into preset object