Cycling 74 » Topic: [is it a feature?] De-encapsulation and #format arguments http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-it-a-feature-de-encapsulation-and-format-arguments/feed Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:31:25 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4 http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-it-a-feature-de-encapsulation-and-format-arguments/#post-44945 <![CDATA[[is it a feature?] De-encapsulation and #format arguments]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-it-a-feature-de-encapsulation-and-format-arguments/#post-44945 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:05:52 +0000 Matthew Aidekman If I have an abstraction that utilizes arguments, and I de-encapsulate it. The arguments at the top level patcher get the stuff that I typed into the box and the patchers at every other level retain the #0 #1 language.

is this supposed to happen?

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-it-a-feature-de-encapsulation-and-format-arguments/#post-161864 <![CDATA[Re: [is it a feature?] De-encapsulation and #format arguments]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-it-a-feature-de-encapsulation-and-format-arguments/#post-161864 Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:21:15 +0000 Matthew Aidekman not to be persistent about this. but just to alert you guys, it appears that my strategy of making patches with #0 in them and de-encapsulating them is entirely worthless. I’ve been exploring the issue a few more hours now and there are more ‘issues’ having to do with nested abstractions and using #0.

I hope someone will take a look at this because this strategy has always been very helpful in the past, and being able to do it with #0 would certainly be nice.

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-it-a-feature-de-encapsulation-and-format-arguments/#post-161865 <![CDATA[Re: [is it a feature?] De-encapsulation and #format arguments]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-it-a-feature-de-encapsulation-and-format-arguments/#post-161865 Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:23:26 +0000 Roman Thilenius hm. what could work for you is to use a sub-abstraction with
the #0 inside instead of #0-ing in the patch.

this has been helpful sometimes already when programming or
updating abstractions because the do work -including their #0
stuff – when opened and edited.

-110

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-it-a-feature-de-encapsulation-and-format-arguments/#post-161866 <![CDATA[Re: [is it a feature?] De-encapsulation and #format arguments]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-it-a-feature-de-encapsulation-and-format-arguments/#post-161866 Sun, 02 Aug 2009 03:49:50 +0000 Matthew Aidekman UPDATE. in addition to the stuff I was talking about before,
This appears to be a very reproducible bug.

Basically if your bpatcher is inside a bpatcher. And you copy the outer one, the inner one’s arguments get totally screwed up. It seems like every ten minutes I’m finding a new bug with bpatcher arguments. weird…

]]>