<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: Is scale insconsistent?</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-30354</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Is scale insconsistent?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-30354</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Hello all,</p>
<p>It seems to me that I should get the same exponetially scaled output in the four mapped ranges in the patch below but I don&#8217;t.  If I remove the exponential base value, all four behave identically.  Any thoughts on what I&#8217;m missing here?  I&#8217;m still using 4.5.7&#8230;.does 4.6 act differently?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Lewis</p>
<p>#P window setfont Helvetica 9.;<br />
#P window linecount 1;<br />
#P message 401 52 26 1376265 1.06;<br />
#P message 428 52 21 1376265 1.;<br />
#P comment 102 234 165 1376265 why aren&#8217;t all four outputs the same?;<br />
#P flonum 115 114 55 9 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P flonum 115 193 51 9 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P newex 115 162 34 1376265 * 0.01;<br />
#P newex 115 141 96 1376265 scale 0. 1. 0 100 1.06;<br />
#P flonum 311 193 51 9 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P newex 311 162 34 1376265 * 0.01;<br />
#P number 311 114 55 9 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P newex 311 141 100 1376265 scale 0 100 0 100 1.06;<br />
#P newex 216 74 54 1376265 * 100.;<br />
#P flonum 18 31 55 9 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P flonum 18 114 55 9 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P number 216 114 55 9 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P flonum 216 193 51 9 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P flonum 18 193 51 9 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P newex 216 141 90 1376265 scale 0 100 0 1 1.06;<br />
#P newex 18 141 92 1376265 scale 0. 1. 0. 1. 1.06;<br />
#P comment 83 31 203 1376265 < - scrub from zero to one;<br />
#P comment 401 37 52 1376265 expo or no;<br />
#P connect 8 0 7 0;<br />
#P connect 7 0 2 0;<br />
#P connect 2 0 4 0;<br />
#P fasten 20 0 2 5 406 134 103 134;<br />
#P fasten 19 0 2 5 433 134 103 134;<br />
#P fasten 8 0 17 0 23 79 120 79;<br />
#P connect 17 0 14 0;<br />
#P connect 14 0 15 0;<br />
#P connect 15 0 16 0;<br />
#P fasten 20 0 14 5 406 134 205 134;<br />
#P fasten 19 0 14 5 433 134 205 134;<br />
#P fasten 8 0 9 0 23 59 221 59;<br />
#P connect 9 0 6 0;<br />
#P connect 6 0 3 0;<br />
#P connect 3 0 5 0;<br />
#P fasten 20 0 3 5 406 134 301 134;<br />
#P fasten 19 0 3 5 433 134 301 134;<br />
#P fasten 9 0 11 0 221 96 316 96;<br />
#P connect 11 0 10 0;<br />
#P connect 10 0 12 0;<br />
#P connect 12 0 13 0;<br />
#P fasten 20 0 10 5 406 134 406 134;<br />
#P fasten 19 0 10 5 433 134 406 134;<br />
#P window clipboard copycount 21;</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96893</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Is scale insconsistent?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96893</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Arvid Tomayko</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Yeah &#8211; It&#8217;s been weird ever since I can remember. So I made this patch to do scaling I could predict:</p>
<p>(The idea came from someone on the forum)</p>
<p>
#P window setfont &#8220;Sans Serif&#8221; 9.;<br />
#P window linecount 1;<br />
#P newex 166 179 50 196617 clip 0. 1.;<br />
#P comment 544 240 55 196617 input;<br />
#P comment 585 225 29 196617 max;<br />
#P comment 506 225 29 196617 min;<br />
#P comment 463 225 29 196617 max;<br />
#P comment 507 99 100 196617 0.5;<br />
#N picture;<br />
#K replace 281;<br />
#K set 0 73662766 8257942 14942225 50269184 -131072 4718592 4718592 19791998 26607844 0 1966081 655663 8257941 14942362 255 -2134114304 102 6684672 196608 72 72 16 1048579 327680 1050073 315621605 597950464 102 6684975 8257941 14942208 60489728 184549376 -1635778815 0 150994944 -1602224131 2304 41599 -327680 150994944 -1535115271 2304 42623 -589824 150994944 -1468006411 2304 43647 -851968 150994944 -1400897551 2304 44671 -1114112 150994944 -1333788691 2304 45439 -1310720 150994944 -1283457046 2304 46463 -1572864 150994944 -1216348186 2304 47231 -1769472 150994944 -1166016541 2304 48255 -2031616 150994944 -1115684896 2304 49023 -2228224 150994944 -1048576036 2304 49791 -2424832 150994944 -998244391 2304 50559 -2621440 150994944 -947912746 2304 51327 -2818048 150994944 -897581101 2304 52095 -3014656 150994944 -847249456 2304 52863 -3211264 150994944 -796917811 2304 53631 -3407872 150994944 -763363381 2304 54399 -3604480 150994944 -713031736 2304 54911 -3735552 150994944 -662700091 2304 55679 -3932160 150994944 -629145661 2304;<br />
#K set 128 56447 -4128768 150994944 -578814016 2304 56959 -4259840 150994944 -545259586 2304 57471 -4390912 150994944 -511705156 2304 57983 -4521984 150994944 -461373511 2304 58751 -4718592 150994944 -427819081 2304 59263 -4849664 150994944 -394264651 2304 59775 -4980736 150994944 -360710221 2304 60287 -5111808 150994944 -327155791 2304 60543 -5177344 150994944 -310378576 2304 61055 -5308416 150994944 -276824146 2304 61567 -5439488 150994944 -243269716 2304 62079 -5570560 150994944 -226492501 2304 62335 -5636096 150994944 -192938071 2304 62591 -5701632 150994944 -176160856 2304 63103 -5832704 150994944 -159383641 2304 63359 -5898240 150994944 -125829211 2304 63615 -5963776 150994944 -109051996 2304 63871 -6029312 150994944 -92274781 2304 64127 -6094848 150994944 -75497566 2304 64383 -6160384 150994944 -58720351 2304 64639 -6225920 150994944 -41943136 2304 64895 -6291456 150994944 -41943136 2304 65151 -6356992 150994944 -25165921 2304 65151 -6356992 167903232 2147450879 -1644167158 33554559 -8388706 2562 32767 2147458560 655872 8388479 -6422528;<br />
#K set 256 134283264 2147458304 524544 8388509 2049 32767 -1660944376 16777343 -6488064 134283264 2147458304 524544 8388509 2049 32767 -1660944376 16777343 -6488064 134283264 2147458304 524544 8388509 923 923 255;<br />
#P vpicture 506 118 610 224;<br />
#N picture;<br />
#K replace 283;<br />
#K set 0 74187054 8257942 14942225 50269184 -131072 4718592 4718592 19791998 26607844 0 1966081 655663 8257941 14942362 255 -2134114304 102 6684672 196608 72 72 16 1048579 327680 1050073 315621605 597950464 102 6684975 8257941 14942208 60489728 184549376 -1635778815 0 184549376 -1635778815 0 150994944 -1619001346 2304 40831 -131072 150994944 -1602224131 2304 41087 -196608 150994944 -1585446916 2304 41343 -262144 150994944 -1568669701 2304 41599 -327680 150994944 -1551892486 2304 41855 -393216 150994944 -1535115271 2304 42111 -458752 150994944 -1518338056 2304 42623 -589824 150994944 -1501560841 2304 42879 -655360 150994944 -1484783626 2304 43135 -720896 150994944 -1468006411 2304 43391 -786432 150994944 -1451229196 2304 43647 -851968 150994944 -1417674766 2304 43903 -917504 150994944 -1400897551 2304 44159 -983040 150994944 -1384120336 2304 44671 -1114112 150994944 -1367343121 2304 44927 -1179648 150994944 -1350565906 2304 45183 -1245184 150994944 -1317011476 2304 45439 -1310720 150994944 -1300234261 2304 45695 -1376256;<br />
#K set 128 150994944 -1283457046 2304 46207 -1507328 150994944 -1266679831 2304 46463 -1572864 150994944 -1233125401 2304 46719 -1638400 150994944 -1216348186 2304 47231 -1769472 150994944 -1199570971 2304 47487 -1835008 150994944 -1166016541 2304 47743 -1900544 150994944 -1149239326 2304 48255 -2031616 150994944 -1115684896 2304 48511 -2097152 150994944 -1098907681 2304 49023 -2228224 150994944 -1065353251 2304 49279 -2293760 150994944 -1048576036 2304 49791 -2424832 150994944 -1015021606 2304 50303 -2555904 150994944 -998244391 2304 50559 -2621440 150994944 -964689961 2304 51071 -2752512 150994944 -931135531 2304 51583 -2883584 150994944 -897581101 2304 51839 -2949120 150994944 -880803886 2304 52351 -3080192 150994944 -847249456 2304 52863 -3211264 150994944 -813695026 2304 53375 -3342336 150994944 -780140596 2304 53887 -3473408 150994944 -746586166 2304 54655 -3670016 150994944 -696254521 2304 55167 -3801088 150994944 -662700091 2304 55679 -3932160 150994944 -612368446 2304 56447 -4128768 150994944 -578814016 2304 57215 -4325376 150994944 -528482371 2304;<br />
#K set 256 57983 -4521984 150994944 -478150726 2304 58751 -4718592 150994944 -411041866 2304 59775 -4980736 150994944 -343933006 2304 61055 -5308416 150994944 -243269716 2304 62591 -5701632 150994944 -109051996 923 923 255;<br />
#P vpicture 384 118 488 224;<br />
#P comment 42 173 100 196617 5 power: $5;<br />
#P comment 42 157 100 196617 4 out high: $4;<br />
#P comment 42 141 100 196617 3 out low: $3;<br />
#P comment 42 125 100 196617 2 input high: $2;<br />
#P comment 42 109 100 196617 1 input low: $1;<br />
#P comment 42 93 100 196617 Arguments:;<br />
#P inlet 316 36 15 0;<br />
#P inlet 166 36 15 0;<br />
#P inlet 196 36 15 0;<br />
#P inlet 226 36 15 0;<br />
#P inlet 256 36 15 0;<br />
#P inlet 286 36 15 0;<br />
#P outlet 166 315 15 0;<br />
#P newex 166 239 164 196617 scale 0. 1. $3 $4;<br />
#P newex 166 209 44 196617 pow $5;<br />
#P newex 166 149 164 196617 scale $1 $2 0. 1.;<br />
#P window setfont &#8220;Arial Black&#8221; 14.;<br />
#P comment 42 71 100 791478286 atp.scale;<br />
#P window setfont &#8220;Sans Serif&#8221; 9.;<br />
#P comment 385 79 217 196617 Example Power Settings:;<br />
#P comment 385 99 100 196617 2;<br />
#P comment 384 225 29 196617 min;<br />
#P comment 424 240 55 196617 input;<br />
#P window linecount 5;<br />
#P comment 222 171 100 196617 clips to range to avoid nan error with non-even powers when negative number is input;<br />
#P connect 10 0 8 4;<br />
#P lcolor 8;<br />
#P connect 11 0 8 3;<br />
#P lcolor 8;<br />
#P connect 12 0 6 2;<br />
#P connect 15 0 7 1;<br />
#P lcolor 15;<br />
#P connect 13 0 6 1;<br />
#P connect 8 0 9 0;<br />
#P connect 7 0 8 0;<br />
#P connect 29 0 7 0;<br />
#P connect 6 0 29 0;<br />
#P connect 14 0 6 0;<br />
#P window clipboard copycount 30;</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96894</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Is scale insconsistent?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96894</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Stefan Tiedje</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Lewis Keller wrote:<br />
> It seems to me that I should get the same exponetially scaled output<br />
> in the four mapped ranges in the patch below but I don&#8217;t.  If I<br />
> remove the exponential base value, all four behave identically.  Any<br />
> thoughts on what I&#8217;m missing here?  I&#8217;m still using 4.5.7&#8230;.does 4.6<br />
> act differently?</p>
<p>I gave up on the fifth argument a long time ago. Its not really <br />
documented what it does and is, as you show just buggy.<br />
I would even recommend to eliminate the documentation about the 5th <br />
argument, or maybe just mention, that it exists only for backwards <br />
compatibility, but should not be considered usefull. Any other method <br />
for tweaking and curving is better.<br />
I love to use either atodb/dbto or mtof/ftom. For musical purposes it <br />
has the advantage that it also documents what you want to do by naming it&#8230;</p>
<p>And last not least, Litter from Peter does contain correctly working <br />
scale objects. He will chime in and tell you if its available with the <br />
free starter pack or if you need pro&#8230;<br />
(I have to leave you some space Peter, I know you can&#8217;t resist, love <br />
it&#8230; ;-)</p>
<p>Stefan</p>
<p>&#8211; <br />
Stefan Tiedje&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;x&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8211;_____&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;|&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8211;(_|_ &#8212;-|&#8212;&#8211;|&#8212;&#8211;()&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8211; _|_)&#8212;-|&#8212;&#8211;()&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-()&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;www.ccmix.com</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96895</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Is scale insconsistent?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96895</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Quote: Stefan Tiedje wrote on Mon, 19 February 2007 22:04<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
> I gave up on the fifth argument a long time ago. Its not really <br />
> documented what it does and is, as you show just buggy.</p>
<p>Do you think that I should submit this as a bug report then?  Or is this old news?  I searched for evidence of previous reports to the list but came up empty.  Perhaps this is common knowledge to Cycling folks and not worth bugging them about again?  Ouch, sorry.</p>
<p>> And last not least, Litter from Peter does contain correctly working <br />
> scale objects. He will chime in and tell you if its available with the <br />
> free starter pack or if you need pro&#8230;<br />
> (I have to leave you some space Peter, I know you can&#8217;t resist, love <br />
> it&#8230; ;-)</p>
<p>Why have I been so blind!  Of course I have the starter pack but downloaded it when I was a wee starter myself and didn&#8217;t know what to do with any of it.  I really should go through all of the externals&#8217; help files from stuff I downloaded a couple of years ago and see how many things I&#8217;ve been doing the hard way!  Thanks for the advice.</p>
<p>Lewis</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96896</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Is scale insconsistent?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96896</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Quote: arvidtp wrote on Mon, 19 February 2007 14:34<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
> Yeah &#8211; It&#8217;s been weird ever since I can remember. So I made this patch to do scaling I could predict:<br />
> <br />
> (The idea came from someone on the forum)<br />
> </p>
<p>That&#8217;s beautiful, thanks for that!</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96897</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Is scale insconsistent?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96897</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Stefan Tiedje</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Lewis Keller wrote:<br />
> Do you think that I should submit this as a bug report then?  Or is<br />
> this old news?  I searched for evidence of previous reports to the<br />
> list but came up empty.  Perhaps this is common knowledge to Cycling<br />
> folks and not worth bugging them about again?  Ouch, sorry.</p>
<p>Its old news and its difficult to fix at the same time. Whenever there <br />
is a weak design, and its been around for a long time, you just can&#8217;t <br />
change the design. In the end, the buggy part, that, which definitely <br />
doesn&#8217;t work as advertised, isn&#8217;t too much worth to bother. Better get <br />
your patch work the way you think, and that would require to ignore that <br />
5th parameter anyway&#8230;<br />
Personaly I don&#8217;t care at all if this will be fixed or not&#8230;</p>
<p>> Why have I been so blind!  Of course I have the starter pack but<br />
> downloaded it when I was a wee starter myself and didn&#8217;t know what to<br />
> do with any of it.  I really should go through all of the externals&#8217;<br />
> help files from stuff I downloaded a couple of years ago and see how<br />
> many things I&#8217;ve been doing the hard way!  Thanks for the advice.</p>
<p>Ah, and to get you into specific, 3rd parties, I&#8217;ll do it like Peter, <br />
you should have a look at my collection (at c74/share), its all <br />
abstractions which you could analyse and hopefully get some inspiration <br />
from&#8230; (and its free as in speaking about beer&#8230; ;-)</p>
<p>Stefan</p>
<p>&#8211; <br />
Stefan Tiedje&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;x&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8211;_____&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;|&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8211;(_|_ &#8212;-|&#8212;&#8211;|&#8212;&#8211;()&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8211; _|_)&#8212;-|&#8212;&#8211;()&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-()&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;www.ccmix.com</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96898</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Is scale insconsistent?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96898</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Peter Castine</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>> It seems to me that I should get the same exponetially scaled  <br />
> output in the four mapped ranges in the patch below but I don&#8217;t.   <br />
> If I remove the exponential base value, all four behave  <br />
> identically.  Any thoughts on what I&#8217;m missing here?  I&#8217;m still  <br />
> using 4.5.7&#8230;.does 4.6 act differently?</p>
<p>I use the patch below. Everything is fine, consistent, and has more  <br />
options than scale anyway.</p>
<p>Arvid&#8217;s patch is nice, but it&#8217;s not an exponential mapping. The  <br />
following also demonstrates the (subtle) differences between  <br />
exponential and power mappings.</p>
<p>#P window setfont &#8220;Sans Serif&#8221; 9.;<br />
#P window linecount 1;<br />
#P newex 569 30 83 196617 loadmess set 1;<br />
#P user umenu 605 53 47 196647 1 64 69 1;<br />
#X add lin;<br />
#X add exp;<br />
#X add pow;<br />
#P message 675 53 33 196617 1.06;<br />
#P message 713 53 17 196617 1.;<br />
#P comment 275 234 184 196617 why are all four outputs the same?;<br />
#P flonum 206 114 55 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P flonum 206 193 51 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P newex 206 162 44 196617 * 0.01;<br />
#P newex 206 141 187 196617 lp.scampf map 0. 1. 0 100 exp 1.06;<br />
#P flonum 582 193 51 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P newex 582 162 44 196617 * 0.01;<br />
#P number 582 114 55 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P newex 582 141 193 196617 lp.scampf map 0 100 0 100 exp 1.06;<br />
#P newex 399 74 44 196617 * 100.;<br />
#P flonum 18 31 55 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P flonum 18 114 55 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P number 399 114 55 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P flonum 399 193 51 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P flonum 18 193 51 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;<br />
#P newex 399 141 180 196617 lp.scampf map 0 100 0 1 exp 1.06;<br />
#P newex 18 141 180 196617 lp.scampf map 0. 1. 0. 1. exp 1.06;<br />
#P comment 78 31 137 196617 < - scrub from zero to one;<br />
#P comment 672 28 61 196617 expo or no;<br />
#P fasten 22 0 21 0 574 51 610 51;<br />
#P fasten 21 1 2 0 647 137 23 137;<br />
#P fasten 21 1 14 0 647 137 211 137;<br />
#P fasten 21 1 3 0 647 137 404 137;<br />
#P fasten 21 1 10 0 647 137 587 137;<br />
#P fasten 20 0 2 5 680 134 193 134;<br />
#P fasten 20 0 14 5 680 134 386 134;<br />
#P fasten 20 0 3 5 680 134 574 134;<br />
#P fasten 20 0 10 5 680 132 767 132;<br />
#P fasten 19 0 2 5 718 134 193 134;<br />
#P fasten 19 0 14 5 718 134 386 134;<br />
#P fasten 19 0 3 5 718 134 574 134;<br />
#P fasten 19 0 10 5 718 132 767 132;<br />
#P connect 9 0 6 0;<br />
#P fasten 9 0 11 0 404 96 587 96;<br />
#P connect 8 0 7 0;<br />
#P fasten 8 0 17 0 23 79 211 79;<br />
#P fasten 8 0 9 0 23 59 404 59;<br />
#P connect 14 0 15 0;<br />
#P connect 17 0 14 0;<br />
#P connect 11 0 10 0;<br />
#P connect 10 0 12 0;<br />
#P connect 6 0 3 0;<br />
#P connect 3 0 5 0;<br />
#P connect 7 0 2 0;<br />
#P connect 2 0 4 0;<br />
#P connect 12 0 13 0;<br />
#P connect 15 0 16 0;<br />
#P window clipboard copycount 23;</p>
<p>Requires the Litter Power Starter Pack, available below</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;    <a href="http://www.bek.no/~pcastine/Litter/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bek.no/~pcastine/Litter/</a>    &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Peter Castine             +&#8211;> Litter Power &#038; Litter Bundle for Jitter<br />
                                Universal Binaries on the way<br />
iCE:  Sequencing,  Recording &#038;<br />
       Interface  Building  for                   |home    | chez nous|<br />
       Max/MSP   Extremely cool                   |bei uns |  i nostri|<br />
       <a href="http://www.dspaudio.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dspaudio.com/</a>                   <a href="http://www.castine.de" rel="nofollow">http://www.castine.de</a></p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96899</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Is scale insconsistent?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96899</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Quote: Stefan Tiedje wrote on Tue, 20 February 2007 01:40<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
> <br />
> Ah, and to get you into specific, 3rd parties, I&#8217;ll do it like Peter, <br />
> you should have a look at my collection (at c74/share), its all <br />
> abstractions which you could analyse and hopefully get some inspiration <br />
> from&#8230; (and its free as in speaking about beer&#8230; ;-)<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Stefan, I&#8217;ve already got it.  In fact I recommended St.PresetAid to someone on the list just the other day!  :)  Thanks for sharing your hard work.</p>
<p>Lewis</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96900</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Is scale insconsistent?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96900</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Quote: Peter Castine wrote on Tue, 20 February 2007 02:23<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
> Arvid&#8217;s patch is nice, but it&#8217;s not an exponential mapping. The  <br />
> following also demonstrates the (subtle) differences between  <br />
> exponential and power mappings.</p>
<p>Ah yes, thanks for pointing that out.</p>
<p>> #P comment 275 234 184 196617 why are all four outputs the same?;</p>
<p>LOL!  Because you programmed it to work as advertised.  :)  Thank you too for making the starter pack freely available and for the help.</p>
<p>Lewis</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96901</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Is scale insconsistent?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96901</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Stefan Tiedje</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Lewis Keller wrote:<br />
>> #P comment 275 234 184 196617 why are all four outputs the same?;<br />
> <br />
> LOL!  Because you programmed it to work as advertised.  :)</p>
<p>Actually he didn&#8217;t, and the question should be &#8220;why are all four outputs <br />
not always the same? (try to give it 2.04) The answer would be the int <br />
numberboxes&#8230;</p>
<p>Stefan</p>
<p>&#8211; <br />
Stefan Tiedje&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;x&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8211;_____&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;|&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8211;(_|_ &#8212;-|&#8212;&#8211;|&#8212;&#8211;()&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8211; _|_)&#8212;-|&#8212;&#8211;()&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-()&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;www.ccmix.com</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96902</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Is scale insconsistent?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/is-scale-insconsistent/#post-96902</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Peter Castine</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>On 21-Feb-2007, at 16:14, Stefan Tiedje wrote:</p>
<p>> (try to give it 2.04)</p>
<p>Nice find.</p>
<p>2.04 gets screwed by the [* 100.]. Replace that with a [lp.scampi 100  <br />
round] and everything&#8217;s hunky dory again.</p>
<p>Wow, we just had that in the other thread. Synchronicity, man. Heavy.  <br />
I think I hear &#8216;Dark Side of the Moon&#8217; playing in the next room.</p>
<p>Wow.</p>
<p>This is almost as psychedelic as double-clicking on lp.hyppie.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;    <a href="http://www.bek.no/~pcastine/Litter/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bek.no/~pcastine/Litter/</a>    &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Peter Castine             +&#8211;> Litter Power &#038; Litter Bundle for Jitter<br />
                                Universal Binaries on the way<br />
iCE:  Sequencing,  Recording &#038;<br />
       Interface  Building  for                   |home    | chez nous|<br />
       Max/MSP   Extremely cool                   |bei uns |  i nostri|<br />
       <a href="http://www.dspaudio.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dspaudio.com/</a>                   <a href="http://www.castine.de" rel="nofollow">http://www.castine.de</a></p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

