clankill3r

I'm reading WritingMaxExternalsInJava.pdf and i wonder why the following is like that:

Note that when your constructor takes an array primitive as an argument that it has to be

the first and only argument to your constructor. Thus

are not legal constructors for a Max Java external.

Cause in Java that is legal. Is it the way how Max is communicating with Java?

I'm reading  WritingMaxExternalsInJava.pdf and i wonder why the following is like that:

Note that when your constructor takes an array primitive as an argument that it has to be
the first and only argument to your constructor. Thus
public foo(int[] ia1, int[] ia2)
and
public foo(float f, int[] ia)
are not legal constructors for a Max Java external.

Cause in Java that is legal. Is it the way how Max is communicating with Java?


java: array primitive constructor