jit.phys.multiple

Sep 15, 2012 at 10:30am

jit.phys.multiple

I was trying to reproduce the patch in the the jit.phys.multiple help file. I end up with a slightly different result. Would anybody know why this is? I guess it is to do with any of the attributes.

Attachments:
  1. multiple2.maxpat
#64251
Sep 17, 2012 at 5:39pm

you have a typo in the jit.expr object in “multiple”:
jit.expr @expr snorm[0}*4 snorm[1]*4 snorm[2]*4

that curly right bracket should be straight.

#231681

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.