Cycling 74 » Topic: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/feed Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:06:26 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4 http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-64625 <![CDATA[jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-64625 Thu, 04 Oct 2012 20:05:53 +0000 FineCutBodies Any suggestion if it’s worth to get into pmpd and msd externals or jit.phy pretty much covers now those functions?

Thanx in advance,
Kevin

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233143 <![CDATA[Re: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233143 Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:16:59 +0000 Anthony Palomba I think this would be hard to do in jit.pys. MSD is a mass spring model.
C74, if I am wrong, please post an example. I would love to be able to have
MSD like control over parameters.

I hope in the future C74 will add things like springs, vibrating columns,
elastic materials, membranes, strings, etc. That way you could build your own
virtual instrument and hear what it sounds like!

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233144 <![CDATA[Re: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233144 Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:26:31 +0000 FineCutBodies The constraints (links in MSD) has spring parameters, like dumping, strength, stretch, etc?

http://cycling74.com/docs/max6/dynamic/c74_docs.html#jit.phys.point2point

http://cycling74.com/docs/max6/dynamic/c74_docs.html#jit.phys.6dof

isn’t it the same?

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233145 <![CDATA[Re: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233145 Fri, 05 Oct 2012 01:18:04 +0000 Anthony Palomba Well, stretch value does not imply that it behaves like a spring. But I would rather defer to C74 on this.

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233146 <![CDATA[Re: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233146 Fri, 05 Oct 2012 03:33:42 +0000 ArturMihel jit.phis much magnificent!

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233147 <![CDATA[Re: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233147 Fri, 05 Oct 2012 07:25:21 +0000 Rob Ramirez the jit.phys.6dof constraint provides spring functionality through several attributes.

check out the following 6.0.7 example patch for more info:
Max6/examples/jitter-examples/render/physics/phys.6dof.spring.maxpat

let me know if anything’s not clear on the usage of these attributes.

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233148 <![CDATA[Re: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233148 Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:22:40 +0000 matmat hi,
here a funny spring :)

`

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –
]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233149 <![CDATA[Re: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233149 Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:54:00 +0000 ArturMihel two basic examples: the string and membrane.

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233150 <![CDATA[Re: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233150 Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:13:31 +0000 matmat super cool ArturMihel your string is great !

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233151 <![CDATA[Re: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233151 Fri, 05 Oct 2012 20:43:05 +0000 Rob Ramirez thanks guys, these patches are great!

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233152 <![CDATA[Re: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233152 Fri, 05 Oct 2012 21:00:09 +0000 Anthony Palomba @matmat: thanks for the spring! This could definitely be the beginnings of MaxMSD.

@ArturMihel: This is a great membrane and string, but I was thinking something that would
vibrate at the audio rate. But these could certainly be interesting for modifying control signals.

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233153 <![CDATA[Re: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-233153 Fri, 05 Oct 2012 21:55:10 +0000 FineCutBodies great examples! :) thanx guys! seems for me, maybe you dont need the externals for these basic links…

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-252814 <![CDATA[Reply To: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-252814 Sat, 15 Jun 2013 00:37:20 +0000 pry I can’t find the reason why my blue ball doesn’t affect the string. Could somebody help me ?

regards.

pry

<code>

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

</code>

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-252828 <![CDATA[Reply To: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-252828 Sat, 15 Jun 2013 09:07:11 +0000 Mathieu Chamagne you hit.phys.multiple has @filters pick
so it doesn’t collides with your blue ball…

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-252835 <![CDATA[Reply To: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-252835 Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:39:50 +0000 pry … easy.
Thanks Mathieu.

pry

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-252878 <![CDATA[Reply To: jit.phys vs pmpd vs msd]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/jit-phys-vs-pmpd-vs-msd/#post-252878 Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:43:25 +0000 pry and does somebody know how to adjust elasticty of the string ?

regards

pry

<code>

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

</code>

]]>