Emmanuel Jourdan

I've another problem. The codec quality doesn't seems to affect 

anything. Is that normal, or may I need more coffe? I can't see any 

difference between the differents qualities, the bitrate is always 

the same (seen in quicktime player). The problem is I need to compute 

highquality video and it doesn't seems to be the default value of the 

quality. Is there any secret message to set that?

I've another problem. The codec quality doesn't seems to affect  
anything. Is that normal, or may I need more coffe? I can't see any  
difference between the differents qualities, the bitrate is always  
the same (seen in quicktime player). The problem is I need to compute  
highquality video and it doesn't seems to be the default value of the  
quality. Is there any secret message to set that?

jit-qt-record-codec-quality-problem

I've tested the patch on Windows XP with Quicktime 7.04, and it creates the

I've tested the patch on Windows XP with Quicktime 7.04, and it creates the
files, but they are empty.

Finally, I found the source of the problem. It's not related to the 

codec quality but to the dimensions. The dimensions used for the 

recording source seems always to be the dimensions written as 

arguments (even if you change them via the dim message. Hopefully, 

the patch is more clear than my explanations. Tutu.mov should be a 

lot better (edge more clear) than titi.mov :-)

Finally, I found the source of the problem. It's not related to the  
codec quality but to the dimensions. The dimensions used for the  
recording source seems always to be the dimensions written as  
arguments (even if you change them via the dim message. Hopefully,  
the patch is more clear than my explanations. Tutu.mov should be a  
lot better (edge more clear) than titi.mov :-)

jit.qt.record codec quality problem