<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: loading a patch with pcontrol</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/#post-34150</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[loading a patch with pcontrol]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/#post-34150</link>
					<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Guillaume Evrard</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>hi everybody,</p>
<p>i&#8217;m facing a strange behavior from pcontrol. when i load a patcher by sending the &#8220;load [mypatcher]&#8221; message, every #x in [mypatcher] is replaced by &#8217;0&#8242;(if x>0), and every #0 is replaced by a pid number. As [mypatcher] is editable, #0 should be &#8216;#0&#8242; and #x should be &#8216;#x&#8217; &#8230; weird.</p>
<p>any idea?</p>
<p>G.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/#post-114802</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: loading a patch with pcontrol]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/#post-114802</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Stefan Tiedje</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>guillaume schrieb:<br />
> i&#8217;m facing a strange behavior from pcontrol. when i load a patcher by<br />
> sending the &#8220;load [mypatch]&#8221; message, every #x in [mypatcher] is<br />
> replaced by &#8217;0&#8242;(if x>0), and every #0 is replaced by a pid number. As<br />
> [mypatcher] is editable, #0 should be &#8216;#0&#8242; and #x should be &#8216;#x&#8217; &#8230;<br />
> weird.</p>
<p>Yes it seems to be a bug, or feature, dependent on the context. You must <br />
not save a patch opened like that, elsewise you destroy the original.<br />
It might make sense though, as you usually won&#8217;t open patches which <br />
require arguments with pcontrol, and that way they would have at least a <br />
meaningless value passed&#8230;</p>
<p>But I agree, I vote for being it a bug, as its pontentially dangerous, <br />
and of no specific use. As there was no answer to that post, I&#8217;d wonder <br />
if it was recognized by cycling&#8230;</p>
<p>This bug might be related to another observation I made, where for no <br />
reason I was aware of, suddenly #0 arguments showed up in my patches as <br />
former unique numbers, rendering multiple instances of the patcher non <br />
functioning. I don&#8217;t know how this happend, but might be related to that&#8230;</p>
<p>Stefan</p>
<p>&#8211; <br />
Stefan Tiedje&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;x&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8211;_____&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;|&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8211;(_|_ &#8212;-|&#8212;&#8211;|&#8212;&#8211;()&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8211; _|_)&#8212;-|&#8212;&#8211;()&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-()&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;www.ccmix.com</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/#post-114803</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: loading a patch with pcontrol]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/#post-114803</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Guillaume Evrard</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>hi stefan,</p>
<p>thanks for your reply, i also vote for this to be a bug.<br />
my goal was to have a nice button &#8220;new project&#8221; in my application, wich load the template i made. my projects need #0 and #1 to be identified in the plateform i made. So i can&#8217;t make my nice &#8220;new project&#8221; button.</p>
<p>i tried to identified the pid (the one wich replace my #0 when loadind with pcontrol) but i can&#8217;t manage to find this process, maybe it&#8217;s the &#8220;open&#8221; routine of the max system.</p>
<p>the question is : what&#8217;s the difference between file->open and load->pcontrol.</p>
<p>i think this two way to open a patch should act similarly (in a perfect world).</p>
<p>anyway, max 5 is coming, with no weird behaviors or bugs of course :)</p>
<p>G</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/#post-114804</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: loading a patch with pcontrol]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/#post-114804</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Stefan Tiedje</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>guillaume schrieb:<br />
> the question is : what&#8217;s the difference between file->open and<br />
> load->pcontrol.</p>
<p>You could try to open the patch with the launchbrowser message to Max, <br />
then the OS is opening it and not Max. I&#8217;d give it a try&#8230;</p>
<p>Stefan</p>
<p>&#8211; <br />
Stefan Tiedje&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;x&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8211;_____&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;|&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8211;(_|_ &#8212;-|&#8212;&#8211;|&#8212;&#8211;()&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8211; _|_)&#8212;-|&#8212;&#8211;()&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-()&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;www.ccmix.com</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/#post-114805</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: loading a patch with pcontrol]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/#post-114805</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Guillaume Evrard</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>wow, nice trick.<br />
[; max launchbrowser file:///Volumes/Data/path/to/the/file.mxt]<br />
i think it just works fine.<br />
thanks a lot.<br />
g</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/#post-114806</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: loading a patch with pcontrol]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/#post-114806</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Guillaume Evrard</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>sorry i reply to myself, </p>
<p>for your information, this way to open a patch allow you to launch any application from Max. When the path point to a file, this file is opened with the default application, specified in your OS preferences.</p>
<p>cheers</p>
<p>g</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/#post-114807</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: loading a patch with pcontrol]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/loading-a-patch-with-pcontrol/#post-114807</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>seejayjames</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Holy cow!  I had always thought the launchbrowser meant Max opened a Web browser only, and you could only go to a URL. But you can drop any file and it opens with the default application&#8230;. that is really great!  Not mentioned in the docs, at least that I found &#8212; that would be good to include in there. </p>
<p>Guess I just never thought of it. But when you said</p>
<p>&#8220;You could try to open the patch with the launchbrowser message to Max, then the OS is opening it and not Max.&#8221;</p>
<p>it got me thinking. Great stuff, thanks ! !</p>
<p>&#8211;CJ</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

