Pierre Alexandre Tremblay

I know what the problem is (seeding of PRG) but I want to see if there is a solution out there?

many-instances-of-sc-brownnoise-are-outputing-the-same

you could randomly delay the signals but it depends on the application if you are ok with that.

OK I've done it myself with a bit of help

gives me the same spectrum than the sc one and

gives me a more rigorous one down to 20 Hz

now we´re waiting for peter to explain us why _that makes a totally different noise.

please Dr Peter, tell us! Seriously I considered the Litter Package but the website was talking a lot about max 4 and 5 and not 5 and 6 so I was worried ;-)

lp.pfff~ will do Brownian noise (aka "red" noise) just fine, also on Max 6. No issues with multiple instantiations: each one is independent, random, non-correlated, etc. etc.

There have been no reports of Litter Pro and Max 6 playing other than completely nicely with each other. While I haven't had the opportunity to do any stress testing or specific optimizations of Litter Power for Max6 (and won't before my move from Edinburgh back to Berlin is completely behind me), if there had been any difficulties I daresay I would have heard of them by now.

BTW, if you like Brownian noise, you'll love Black Noise! (lp.phhh~ :~)

@Roman: onepole~ is not the filter you are looking for.But it looks like it's pretty close.

There have been no reports of Litter Pro and Max 6 playing other than completely nicely with each other. While I haven't had the opportunity to do any stress testing or specific optimizations of Litter Power for Max6 (and won't before my move from Edinburgh back to Berlin is completely behind me), if there had been any difficulties I daresay I would have heard of them by now. 

@Roman: onepole~ is not the filter you are looking for.But it looks like it's pretty close.


Assuming you are speaking of this http://sbl.github.com/sc-max/ : Which version are you using?
I think I fixed this a while ago.


many instances of sc.brownnoise~ are outputing the same...