CKNY

Just try to get any advice from here. I have a new Mac Pro Dual Core 2.66. I made patch which has already used a lot of CPU utilities (around 60%~70%).......but I still need to record it back by "sfrecord~". I know I am not gonna make it because I use 8 channels. Once I start recording, CPU utilities is going to 100% immediatly.

So I just think if there is any possible to manage the CPU since my computer is dual core. I mean, use playback in one CPU and use record by another. Is is possible work? anyone?

Just try to get any advice from here. I have a new Mac Pro Dual Core 2.66. I made patch which has already used a lot of CPU utilities (around 60%~70%).......but I still need to record it back by "sfrecord~". I know I am not gonna make it because I use 8 channels. Once I start recording, CPU utilities is going to 100% immediatly. 

maxmsp-with-new-dual-core-mac-pro

Quote: CKNY wrote on Mon, 01 October 2007 12:30

----------------------------------------------------

> Just try to get any advice from here. I have a new Mac Pro Dual Core 2.66. I made patch which has already used a lot of CPU utilities (around 60%~70%).......but I still need to record it back by "sfrecord~". I know I am not gonna make it because I use 8 channels. Once I start recording, CPU utilities is going to 100% immediatly. 

i assume that you set the vectorsize to 2 instead of 32 or 64 otherwise you wouldnt see that.

Quote: CKNY wrote on Mon, 01 October 2007 12:30
----------------------------------------------------
> Hi,
>
> Just try to get any advice from here. I have a new Mac Pro Dual Core 2.66. I made patch which has already used a lot of CPU utilities (around 60%~70%).......but I still need to record it back by "sfrecord~". I know I am not gonna make it because I use 8 channels. Once I start recording, CPU utilities is going to 100% immediatly. 
>

i assume that you set the vectorsize to 2 instead of 32 or 64 otherwise you wouldnt see that.


> Just try to get any advice from here. I have a new Mac Pro Dual Core

> 2.66. I made patch which has already used a lot of CPU utilities

> (around 60%~70%).......but I still need to record it back by

> "sfrecord~". I know I am not gonna make it because I use 8 channels.

> Once I start recording, CPU utilities is going to 100% immediatly.

Quickrecord with setting to record 8 channels uses 3% CPU on my 

comparatively slow PPC Powerbook. On your machine it should need less 

If Roman is right with his guess, please let us know...

UCDMSRA schrieb:
> Just try to get any advice from here. I have a new Mac Pro Dual Core
> 2.66. I made patch which has already used a lot of CPU utilities
> (around 60%~70%).......but I still need to record it back by
> "sfrecord~". I know I am not gonna make it because I use 8 channels.
> Once I start recording, CPU utilities is going to 100% immediatly.

Quickrecord with setting to record 8 channels uses 3% CPU on my 
comparatively slow PPC Powerbook. On your machine it should need less 
than 1%... There must be another reason.
If Roman is right with his guess, please let us know...

-- 
Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
--_____-----------|--------------
--(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
-- _|_)----|-----()--------------
----------()--------www.ccmix.com


Max/MSP with new Dual Core Mac Pro