<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: midi note event priority?</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/midi-note-event-priority/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/midi-note-event-priority/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/midi-note-event-priority/#post-66445</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[midi note event priority?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/midi-note-event-priority/#post-66445</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>lawnghost</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I&#8217;m trying to make a patch that takes actions based on midi note on/off events.  I&#8217;m using the notein &#038; borax objects to parse incoming midi messages.  The problem I&#8217;m running into is when an ON &#038; OFF message occur simultaneously.  My patch will start running for one of the messages, but it gets interrupted in the middle of processing by the second message.  I know I can use speedlim to throttle the speed of incoming messages, but I don&#8217;t want to introduce unnecessary latency.  Is there some way to mark a patch &#8220;high priority&#8221; or otherwise allow it to finish evaluation before processing subsequent midi messages?</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/midi-note-event-priority/#post-239209</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: midi note event priority?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/midi-note-event-priority/#post-239209</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>broc</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>This article may be helpful</p>
<p><a href="http://cycling74.com/2004/09/09/event-priority-in-max-scheduler-vs-queue/" rel="nofollow">http://cycling74.com/2004/09/09/event-priority-in-max-scheduler-vs-queue/</a></p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/midi-note-event-priority/#post-239210</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: midi note event priority?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/midi-note-event-priority/#post-239210</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>lawnghost</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>yes! thank you! deferlow is what i was looking for.<br />
I&#8217;m embarrassed to say I came across the article before, but dismissed it too quickly, thinking it was only about &#8220;overdrive&#8221;.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

