Misbehaving coll – patch inside

Nov 23, 2011 at 3:01pm

Misbehaving coll – patch inside

Hi guys, I’m having trouble with a patch I’m working on as part of a megapatch.

The basic idea is to generate a list of numbers for a coll to send through to some multisliders – I’m using the jit.nois + plur combination mentioned in this tutorial (http://cycling74.com/2010/06/14/noise-tutorial-1-riding-tandem-with-the-random/)

The problem I’m encountering is that every time I send a bang manually from the top by clicking I get the right behaviour — 30 lists in the coll to choose from.
Every time I get the patch to automatically bang itself the coll only seems to get 1 list to choose from.

The patch is bellow, I’d be very appreciative to anyone who can help/debug.

Thanks.

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –
#60187
Nov 23, 2011 at 5:39pm

I think a [deferlow] between the [r rejig] and the [t b b b b] in the upper left of your patch should get you there.

#216668
Nov 23, 2011 at 7:51pm

Aha! That fixed it. I wonder why that was necessary?

Thanks mate.

#216669
Nov 23, 2011 at 8:49pm

I was wondering that too. I manually did a bang into the [send rejig] just moments after the counter did it, and it worked, whereas coming from the counter…nope. Can’t figure out why the two would be different…anyway, in cases like this, often a well-placed [deferlow] will help out, as mentioned.

One other idea, not that it’s necessary per se, but you could also just use [jit.matrix] objects to hold your lists of generated data rather than [coll]. Then you can access by [jit.submatrix] or [jit.spill] to get the lists. Might be faster than writing to and and accessing [coll] objects, not sure.

#216670
Nov 23, 2011 at 10:26pm

The difference is that after the deferlow it is not driven from an interrupt. This fixes many problems of this sort. I could not tell you why it’s needed here, though.

#216671
Nov 24, 2011 at 12:53am

I just wonder why Max doesn’t give a warning/error message if defer or deferlow is needed.
For example, SuperCollider does it. Why not Max?

#216672

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.