<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: monomeemu compatible with M4L 6/Live 9?</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/monomeemu-compatible-with-m4l-6live-9/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/monomeemu-compatible-with-m4l-6live-9/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/monomeemu-compatible-with-m4l-6live-9/#post-66714</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[monomeemu compatible with M4L 6/Live 9?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/monomeemu-compatible-with-m4l-6live-9/#post-66714</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>qrtzcntrl</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Hi,<br />
I read there were issues regarding backwards compatibility between M4L 5.1.9 and 6&#8230; about a year ago or so..  Specifically, regarding the JS Live API. I&#8217;m pretty new to Max, and the task of porting monomeemu v0.9.6a5 to Max 6, especially if there&#8217;s fundamental changes to M4L abstractions could find me a bit out of my depth.  Has anyone tested Live 9 with Max 6, and the backwards compatibility of 5.1.9 amxds at all in the current betas? Bit of a deal breaker for me if I lose my monomemu for launchpad if I upgrade to Live 9..  anyway, appreciate anyone&#8217;s views/observations etc, even if it is a bit early given Live 9 isn&#8217;t even out yet..<br />
Cheers,<br />
Leon</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

