Wetterberg

I just noticed that my installation of maxmsp is missing the [mtof] 

object. It's strange, because, as far as I can tell it is the only 

object that's missing... strange. Has anyone else seen this? Apart from 

this everything is working fine, and I have the ejies, which has a java 

version of mtof in it, so there's no real problem. I'm just wondering, 

WinXP, 4.6.2, jitter 1.6.3b2, latest java.

I just noticed that my installation of maxmsp is missing the [mtof] 
object.  It's strange, because, as far as I can tell it  is the only 
object that's missing... strange. Has anyone else seen this? Apart from 
this everything is working fine, and I have the ejies, which has a java 
version of mtof in it, so there's no real problem. I'm just wondering, 
really.

WinXP, 4.6.2, jitter 1.6.3b2, latest java.
Andreas.


mtof-missing

On 22 mars 07, at 12:22, Andreas Wetterberg wrote:

> I just noticed that my installation of maxmsp is missing the [mtof] 

> object. It's strange, because, as far as I can tell it is the 

> only object that's missing... strange. Has anyone else seen this? 

> Apart from this everything is working fine, and I have the ejies, 

> which has a java version of mtof in it, so there's no real problem. 

If you install the ejies correctly (as described in the read-me 

file), everything should be fine. Make sure the java classes are in 

> Hi all,
>
> I just noticed that my installation of maxmsp is missing the [mtof]  
> object.  It's strange, because, as far as I can tell it  is the  
> only object that's missing... strange. Has anyone else seen this?  
> Apart from this everything is working fine, and I have the ejies,  
> which has a java version of mtof in it, so there's no real problem.  
> I'm just wondering, really.

If you install the ejies correctly (as described in the read-me  
file), everything should be fine. Make sure the java classes are in  
the C74/java/classes/ej/ folder.

> On 22 mars 07, at 12:22, Andreas Wetterberg wrote:

>> I just noticed that my installation of maxmsp is missing the [mtof] 

>> object. It's strange, because, as far as I can tell it is the only 

>> object that's missing... strange. Has anyone else seen this? Apart 

>> from this everything is working fine, and I have the ejies, which has 

>> a java version of mtof in it, so there's no real problem. I'm just 

> If you install the ejies correctly (as described in the read-me file), 

> everything should be fine. Make sure the java classes are in the 

I think you misunderstood my request: The ejies work (and thank you very 

The standard max-object MTOF does not work, however. I've since done a 

full search, and found mtof.mxe... right where it should be: C:Program 

FilesCycling '74MaxMSP 4.6Cycling '74externals

I've manually added the search path into max, but to no avail. I've also 

searched for abstractions erroneously named mtof, and found nothing, either.

Emmanuel Jourdan skrev:
> On 22 mars 07, at 12:22, Andreas Wetterberg wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just noticed that my installation of maxmsp is missing the [mtof] 
>> object.  It's strange, because, as far as I can tell it  is the only 
>> object that's missing... strange. Has anyone else seen this? Apart 
>> from this everything is working fine, and I have the ejies, which has 
>> a java version of mtof in it, so there's no real problem. I'm just 
>> wondering, really.
>
> If you install the ejies correctly (as described in the read-me file), 
> everything should be fine. Make sure the java classes are in the 
> C74/java/classes/ej/ folder.
>
> ej
Hi,
I think you misunderstood my request: The ejies work (and thank you very 
much, esp. for ej.lscale!!!)
The standard max-object MTOF does not work, however. I've since done a 
full search, and found mtof.mxe... right where it should be: C:Program 
FilesCycling '74MaxMSP 4.6Cycling '74externals

I've manually added the search path into max, but to no avail. I've also 
searched for abstractions erroneously named mtof, and found nothing, either.

On 22 mars 07, at 17:47, Andreas Wetterberg wrote:

I'm not sure. does the normal mtof, ftom and urn objects work? If not 

this might be because there's in my ejies a mtof, ftom and urn java 

classes (part of the ej package). So if the java classes are not in 

the correct folder (c74:/java/classes/ej/), it might be the problem.

I'm not sure. does the normal mtof, ftom and urn objects work? If not  
this might be because there's in my ejies a mtof, ftom and urn java  
classes (part of the ej package). So if the java classes are not in  
the correct folder (c74:/java/classes/ej/), it might be the problem.

> Has anyone else seen this? Apart from this everything is working

> fine, and I have the ejies, which has a java version of mtof in it,

> so there's no real problem. I'm just wondering, really.

Its not missing, its a name clash between the java version and the

external. If max finds the java version before the external it won't load...

Andreas Wetterberg schrieb:
> Has anyone else seen this? Apart from this everything is working
> fine, and I have the ejies, which has a java version of mtof in it,
> so there's no real problem. I'm just wondering, really.

Its not missing, its a name clash between the java version and the
external. If max finds the java version before the external it won't load...

-- 
Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
--_____-----------|--------------
--(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
-- _|_)----|-----()--------------
----------()--------www.ccmix.com


>> Has anyone else seen this? Apart from this everything is working

>> fine, and I have the ejies, which has a java version of mtof in it,

>> so there's no real problem. I'm just wondering, really.

> Its not missing, its a name clash between the java version and the

> external. If max finds the java version before the external it won't 

Thank you Stefan, but that is naturally the first thing I checked. 

Anyway, since the class is from the ejies, it's of course called 

ej.mtof, so it's not a name clash. I've also done a full computer scan 

and found only one file called "mtof" - the one in the externals folder 

that is supposed to be working but isn't ;)

Stefan Tiedje skrev:
> Andreas Wetterberg schrieb:
>> Has anyone else seen this? Apart from this everything is working
>> fine, and I have the ejies, which has a java version of mtof in it,
>> so there's no real problem. I'm just wondering, really.
>
> Its not missing, its a name clash between the java version and the
> external. If max finds the java version before the external it won't 
> load...
>
> Stefan
Thank you Stefan, but that is naturally the first thing I checked. 
Anyway, since the class is from the ejies, it's of course called 
ej.mtof, so it's not a name clash. I've also done a full computer scan 
and found only one file called "mtof" - the one in the externals folder 
that is supposed to be working but isn't ;)

On 23 mars 07, at 23:06, Andreas Wetterberg wrote:

> Thank you Stefan, but that is naturally the first thing I checked. 

> Anyway, since the class is from the ejies, it's of course called 

> ej.mtof, so it's not a name clash. I've also done a full computer 

> scan and found only one file called "mtof" - the one in the 

> externals folder that is supposed to be working but isn't ;)

I'm the author of the ejies, and I tell you "put the ejies to the 

trash", I won't feel offended or something for now ;-) Then restart 

max. Could you confirm the mtof still doesn't work? If it works, 

download the ejies, use the installation.command and that's it!

> Thank you Stefan, but that is naturally the first thing I checked.  
> Anyway, since the class is from the ejies, it's of course called  
> ej.mtof, so it's not a name clash. I've also done a full computer  
> scan and found only one file called "mtof" - the one in the  
> externals folder that is supposed to be working but isn't ;)

I'm the author of the ejies, and I tell you "put the ejies to the  
trash", I won't feel offended or something for now ;-) Then restart  
max. Could you confirm the mtof still doesn't work? If it  works,  
download the ejies, use the installation.command and that's it!

> On 23 mars 07, at 23:06, Andreas Wetterberg wrote:

>> Thank you Stefan, but that is naturally the first thing I checked. 

>> Anyway, since the class is from the ejies, it's of course called 

>> ej.mtof, so it's not a name clash. I've also done a full computer 

>> scan and found only one file called "mtof" - the one in the externals 

>> folder that is supposed to be working but isn't ;)

> I'm the author of the ejies, and I tell you "put the ejies to the 

> trash", I won't feel offended or something for now ;-) 

AHA! I had this preconception in my head that if I had to enter [mxj 

ej.mtof] then the file associated with it would of course not be named 

so. Strangely, the java class "mtof.class" didn't even show up in the 

searches.... yet it was clearly right there in your folder, Emmanuel! DOH!

I apologize deeply for being so thick-headed! All is well here - now I 

just have to teach myself not to start debugging the system when 

deadlines are looming... No good shall come from this.

Emmanuel Jourdan skrev:
> On 23 mars 07, at 23:06, Andreas Wetterberg wrote:
>
>> Thank you Stefan, but that is naturally the first thing I checked. 
>> Anyway, since the class is from the ejies, it's of course called 
>> ej.mtof, so it's not a name clash. I've also done a full computer 
>> scan and found only one file called "mtof" - the one in the externals 
>> folder that is supposed to be working but isn't ;)
>
> I'm the author of the ejies, and I tell you "put the ejies to the 
> trash", I won't feel offended or something for now ;-) 
:-D
AHA! I had this preconception in my head that if I had to enter [mxj 
ej.mtof] then the file associated with it would of course not be named 
so. Strangely, the java class "mtof.class" didn't even show up in the 
searches.... yet it was clearly right there in your folder, Emmanuel! DOH!

I apologize deeply for being so thick-headed! All is well here - now I 
just have to teach myself not to start debugging the system when 
deadlines are looming... No good shall come from this.

On 24 mars 07, at 00:08, Andreas Wetterberg wrote:

> I apologize deeply for being so thick-headed! All is well here - 

> now I just have to teach myself not to start debugging the system 

> when deadlines are looming... No good shall come from this.

You also reinstalled the ejies, didn't you? Otherwise, I'll feel 

> I apologize deeply for being so thick-headed! All is well here -  
> now I just have to teach myself not to start debugging the system  
> when deadlines are looming... No good shall come from this.

You also reinstalled the ejies, didn't you? Otherwise, I'll feel  
really sad this time ;-)

> On 24 mars 07, at 00:08, Andreas Wetterberg wrote:

>> I apologize deeply for being so thick-headed! All is well here - now 

>> I just have to teach myself not to start debugging the system when 

>> deadlines are looming... No good shall come from this.

> You also reinstalled the ejies, didn't you? Otherwise, I'll feel 

Of course! .... after the deadline! Right now, as long as ej.lscale 

works then my projects work - that's all that matters for the next two 

Emmanuel Jourdan skrev:
> On 24 mars 07, at 00:08, Andreas Wetterberg wrote:
>
>> I apologize deeply for being so thick-headed! All is well here - now 
>> I just have to teach myself not to start debugging the system when 
>> deadlines are looming... No good shall come from this.
>
> You also reinstalled the ejies, didn't you? Otherwise, I'll feel 
> really sad this time ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> ej
Of course! .... after the deadline! Right now, as long as ej.lscale 
works then my projects work - that's all that matters for the next two 
weeks.

[mtof] missing.