multiple messages to route

Aug 3, 2012 at 2:14am

multiple messages to route

Is this this a good way to send multiple simultaneous messages to “route”? It works OK, but I worry that it will bottleneck at the “p thru”. Perhaps “unpack” is preferable to “route” since it takes a single list? Any thoughts greatly appreciated.

[attachment=200766,4273]

#63833
Aug 3, 2012 at 2:52am

Why do you need all the stuff between unpack and the values’ final destination?

#230188
Aug 3, 2012 at 3:15am

Good question! The top part is for a interface/GUI, and the bottom part is for the subpatched instrument/effect. I’ll try to update that tonight.

#230189
Aug 3, 2012 at 3:23am

it makes absolutely no difference if three messages are “sent” via one or via three connections, it is the same thing.

#230190
Aug 3, 2012 at 3:40am

Really? That's good to know. Would that be OK with 100 connections, being updated frequently?

Here's the updated patch photo

[attachment=200770,4275]

Attachments:
  1. routingmessages2.png
#230191

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.