multiple messages to route

Aug 3, 2012 at 2:14am

multiple messages to route

Is this this a good way to send multiple simultaneous messages to “route”? It works OK, but I worry that it will bottleneck at the “p thru”. Perhaps “unpack” is preferable to “route” since it takes a single list? Any thoughts greatly appreciated.


Aug 3, 2012 at 2:52am

Why do you need all the stuff between unpack and the values’ final destination?

Aug 3, 2012 at 3:15am

Good question! The top part is for a interface/GUI, and the bottom part is for the subpatched instrument/effect. I’ll try to update that tonight.

Aug 3, 2012 at 3:23am

it makes absolutely no difference if three messages are “sent” via one or via three connections, it is the same thing.

Aug 3, 2012 at 3:40am

Really? That's good to know. Would that be OK with 100 connections, being updated frequently?

Here's the updated patch photo


  1. routingmessages2.png

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.