|
|
Aug 3, 2012 at 2:14am
multiple messages to route
Is this this a good way to send multiple simultaneous messages to “route”? It works OK, but I worry that it will bottleneck at the “p thru”. Perhaps “unpack” is preferable to “route” since it takes a single list? Any thoughts greatly appreciated.
[attachment=200766,4273]
|
|
|
Aug 3, 2012 at 2:52am
Why do you need all the stuff between unpack and the values’ final destination?
|
|
|
Aug 3, 2012 at 3:15am
Good question! The top part is for a interface/GUI, and the bottom part is for the subpatched instrument/effect. I’ll try to update that tonight.
|
|
|
Aug 3, 2012 at 3:23am
it makes absolutely no difference if three messages are “sent” via one or via three connections, it is the same thing.
|
|
|
Aug 3, 2012 at 3:40am
Really? That's good to know. Would that be OK with 100 connections, being updated frequently?
Here's the updated patch photo
[attachment=200770,4275]
Attachments:
|
