multitouch screen & max (Stantum SMK)

Nov 4, 2008 at 5:17pm

multitouch screen & max (Stantum SMK)

Hi,

I had the chance to put my hands on a Stantum multitouch screens…

here is a small video of my firsts tests with MaxMSP :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnQHoCDxiRw

I won’t be able to live without it, now !

enjoy !

Mathieu Chamagne

________________
Mathieu Chamagne
mathieu.chamagne@free.fr

http://mathieuchamagne.com

http://www.maxobjects.com

#40661
Nov 4, 2008 at 5:34pm

#144018
Nov 4, 2008 at 5:52pm

That is amazing! Do you hook this up to your computer or is this
built in to a laptop? Is it available to the public?

#144019
Nov 4, 2008 at 5:57pm

#144020
Nov 4, 2008 at 6:28pm

#144021
Nov 4, 2008 at 6:57pm

For those who don’t know,
Stantum is the OEM branch of JazzMutant (mutants->stantum), so the underlying technology is the same as the Lemur/Dexter, but with a more general-purpose industry-focused package.

AB

#144022
Nov 4, 2008 at 7:03pm

#144023
Nov 4, 2008 at 7:41pm

> Stantum is the OEM branch of JazzMutant

Thanks, that explain the price…

;-)

pa

#144024
Nov 4, 2008 at 8:02pm

Damn that JazzMutant, I was hoping this was a real competitor.
At this rate, multitouch interfaces will never be affordable.
Your video had me pretty excited but the 5k price just killed
my buzz.

#144025
Nov 4, 2008 at 9:32pm

#144026
Nov 5, 2008 at 6:46pm

Hey Mathieu,
Very cool. Thanks for sharing. Just curious if you had to do anything special to get Max and this multitouch screen to play nicely together?

Thanks,
David

#144027
Nov 5, 2008 at 6:52pm

oops…I see you answered that a few posts up. Sorry!
David

#144028
Nov 6, 2008 at 12:09am

the dell uses a touch frame from http://www.n-trig.com/
they only sell to big ass corporations

http://www.joyplux.com.tw/english/product/product2.html from Taiwan sell 19″
touch frames for 180$ and 22″ for 250$. they also have panels for 42″…. .

, hopefully everybody will have one soon and then we can go multifinger on
the MF

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:52 PM, David Beaudry wrote:

>
> oops…I see you answered that a few posts up. Sorry!
> David
>
>
>

#144029

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.