Cycling 74 » Topic: need help about "zl iter object"

need help about "zl iter object"

all — Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:46:32 +0000

Hi,

What is my trouble :
I want to separate a list (my starting point, of variable lengh) in several lists of 7 integrers.
Then, I want to associate with each list of 7 integrers, a number : 0 for the first list, one for the second list, three for the third list…. (as for the listfunnel object but for list and not for integrers only).
Because, I want to include theses various lists in a “coll” object.

(I feel I have to use “zl iter” object but I don’t know how get this news list of 7 integrers in max).

Thank you for your help.

Best regards

Alexandre

Re: need help about “zl iter object”

o s — Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:31:46 +0000

Like this?

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

Re: need help about “zl iter object”

all — Sat, 24 Sep 2011 13:25:50 +0000

Hi,

Thank you for your help.
However, with your patch, I obtain this result in “coll” object :

1, 2 3 4 5 6 7;
8, 9 10 11 12 13 14;
15, 16 17 18 19 20 21;

And I need to obtain :

1, 2 3 4 5 6 7;
2, 9 10 11 12 13 14;
3, 16 17 18 19 20 21;

Do you know how get this last result ?

Best regards

Alexandre

Re: need help about “zl iter object”

all — Sat, 24 Sep 2011 13:29:42 +0000

Sorry,

I made an error:
I’d like to get this one in “coll” object :
(to add 1,2,3… before each list of 7 integrers)

1, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2, 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
3, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Thank you

Re: need help about “zl iter object”

all — Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:00:30 +0000

thanks to your assistance, I built what I wanted :

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

Re: need help about “zl iter object”

o s — Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:24:41 +0000

if your list have a different length:

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

:-)

Re: need help about “zl iter object”

all — Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:19:21 +0000

Yes, you’re right.
But, it’s perfect with “/7″ object after “zl len” object :

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

:-)

Re: need help about “zl iter object”

o s — Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:44:45 +0000

you are right- I overlooked it…