<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: Newbie Question: SIGNAL/AUDIO rate inlet in a subpatch?</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/newbie-question-signalaudio-rate-inlet-in-a-subpatch/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/newbie-question-signalaudio-rate-inlet-in-a-subpatch/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/newbie-question-signalaudio-rate-inlet-in-a-subpatch/#post-51834</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Newbie Question: SIGNAL/AUDIO rate inlet in a subpatch?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/newbie-question-signalaudio-rate-inlet-in-a-subpatch/#post-51834</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>i have a little delay i built in a subpatch. on one of the inlets of this subpatch i have to feed it an audio signal (obviously) from outside of the subpatch.</p>
<p>i managed to create the subpatch and all its required inlets and outlets. i also created some other objects (like tapin~, tapout~ etc.) for the delay in the subpatch.</p>
<p>however, within the subpatch the connection from the signal/audio rate inlet to the tapin~ module is displayed as a control rate connection (thin black line) instead of a signal/audio rate connection (yellow / black line).</p>
<p>can please somebody help and tell me how to make this connection a signal/audio rate connection?</p>
<p>thank you</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/newbie-question-signalaudio-rate-inlet-in-a-subpatch/#post-186024</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Newbie Question: SIGNAL/AUDIO rate inlet in a subpatch?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/newbie-question-signalaudio-rate-inlet-in-a-subpatch/#post-186024</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Mike S</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>sometimes you have to reconnect them for them to show up as audio connections, but if you have a signal connection going in it will still be a signal inside the patch, it just might not look like it.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/newbie-question-signalaudio-rate-inlet-in-a-subpatch/#post-186025</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Newbie Question: SIGNAL/AUDIO rate inlet in a subpatch?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/newbie-question-signalaudio-rate-inlet-in-a-subpatch/#post-186025</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>kazouki</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>it&#8217;s always a black thin line between the tapin/tapout, you can see an example in the tutorial patch in your max documentation directory.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/newbie-question-signalaudio-rate-inlet-in-a-subpatch/#post-186026</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Newbie Question: SIGNAL/AUDIO rate inlet in a subpatch?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/newbie-question-signalaudio-rate-inlet-in-a-subpatch/#post-186026</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>n00b_meister</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>this might be a very minor bug; what i do is, once my patch and subpatches are complete, i delete these &#8216;non-control&#8217; connections, recreate them and they show up, and remain, signal connections. Unless you have a visually complex and confusing patch, it&#8217;s purely an aesthetic issue i think</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/newbie-question-signalaudio-rate-inlet-in-a-subpatch/#post-186027</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Newbie Question: SIGNAL/AUDIO rate inlet in a subpatch?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/newbie-question-signalaudio-rate-inlet-in-a-subpatch/#post-186027</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>alright, thanks a lot, guys. :)</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/newbie-question-signalaudio-rate-inlet-in-a-subpatch/#post-186028</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Newbie Question: SIGNAL/AUDIO rate inlet in a subpatch?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/newbie-question-signalaudio-rate-inlet-in-a-subpatch/#post-186028</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>seejayjames</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>if you made the subpatch connection first, then added the signal cord into the subpatch, it won&#8217;t update in the subpatch unless you delete and then re-connect. I do think it&#8217;s a minor bug that&#8217;s really just aesthetics. I think if you connect the signal cord from outside first, then make the new one in the subpatch, that inlet knows it&#8217;s getting a signal cord and will create the right-looking one.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

