<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: observing track states &#8211; should I worry about resources?</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/observing-track-states-should-i-worry-about-resources/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/observing-track-states-should-i-worry-about-resources/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/observing-track-states-should-i-worry-about-resources/#post-62297</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[observing track states &#8211; should I worry about resources?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/observing-track-states-should-i-worry-about-resources/#post-62297</link>
					<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 03:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>basvlk</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I&#8217;m re-configuring the functionality of my (2) launchpads: the top 5 rows work as normal clip triggers, the bottom three are: arm &#8211; select track &#8211; stop all clips.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like the &#8216;arm&#8217; and &#8216;select track&#8217; to light up the respective buttons but it means I&#8217;ll need 16x observe objects to observe which tracks are armed and also to observe the &#8216;selected track&#8217; does that sound like a lot of overhead?</p>
<p>what would be a good way for me to measure the impact of implementing this? Live&#8217;s CPU meter?</p>
<p>Thanks!!</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/observing-track-states-should-i-worry-about-resources/#post-225043</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: observing track states &#8211; should I worry about resources?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/observing-track-states-should-i-worry-about-resources/#post-225043</link>
					<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>amounra</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>No, you should be fine.  There&#8217;s very little overhead for on/off objects.  I&#8217;ve done a lot more than that with plain-jane API objects without taking any hit.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/observing-track-states-should-i-worry-about-resources/#post-225044</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: observing track states &#8211; should I worry about resources?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/observing-track-states-should-i-worry-about-resources/#post-225044</link>
					<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>basvlk</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks amounra!! very helpful :-)</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

