<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: opengl spot_cutoff &gt; 90 invalid?</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/opengl-spot_cutoff-90-invalid/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/opengl-spot_cutoff-90-invalid/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/opengl-spot_cutoff-90-invalid/#post-26109</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[opengl spot_cutoff &gt; 90 invalid?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/opengl-spot_cutoff-90-invalid/#post-26109</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 16:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Thijs Koerselman</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>&#8220;spot_cutoff&#8221; values between 90 and 180 are triggering error messages. I&#8217;d<br />
like to morph from 360 positional lighting to spotlights, but I can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>using jitter 1.5.2 I get:<br />
ob3d_draw_end popmatrix: GL Error: Invalid value.</p>
<p>180 or 90 (and below) is fine with Jitter, but everything in between is<br />
invalid.</p>
<p>Is this not accepted by OpenGL standards or is it a possible Jitter bug?</p>
<p>-thijs</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/opengl-spot_cutoff-90-invalid/#post-77602</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: opengl spot_cutoff > 90 invalid?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/opengl-spot_cutoff-90-invalid/#post-77602</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 16:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Gregory Taylor</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Sounds like it might be a good idea to mention again that the standard<br />
OpenGL stuff is available online for you at <a href="http://www.opengl.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.opengl.org/</a> .  <br />
It&#8217;s<br />
a great resource.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/opengl-spot_cutoff-90-invalid/#post-77603</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: opengl spot_cutoff > 90 invalid?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/opengl-spot_cutoff-90-invalid/#post-77603</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 17:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Andrew Benson</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>From the Red Book (p.~189):</p>
<p>&#8220;To specify the angle between the axis of the cone an a ray along the <br />
edge of the cone, use the GL_SPOT_CUTOFF parameter&#8230;.By default, the <br />
spotlight feature is disabled because the GL_SPOT_CUTOFF parameter is <br />
180.0. This value means that light is emitted in all directions (the <br />
angle at the cone&#8217;s apex is 360 degrees,so it isn&#8217;t a cone at all).  The <br />
value for GL_SPOT_CUTOFF is restricted to the range [0.0 90.0] (unless <br />
it has the special value 180.).&#8221;</p>
<p>Andrew B.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/opengl-spot_cutoff-90-invalid/#post-77604</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: opengl spot_cutoff > 90 invalid?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/opengl-spot_cutoff-90-invalid/#post-77604</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 19:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Thijs Koerselman</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Ah, thanks. Sorry for the wasted time and bandwidth. I must have overlooked<br />
it.</p>
<p>-thijs</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

