dunebuggy

I did a search , i saw it is doable with rewire and OS X

Very Very new user
Mac OS 9.2
Pro tools 5.1.3
I/O interface is a 888
How can i output from the 888
Directconnect does not work
I did a search , i saw it is doable with rewire and OS X
thanks


output-thru-digidesign888-io

My question was not complete, what i would like is to use the INPUTS(digidesign 888 I/O).I hope that writing the word digidesign does not restrict me from getting reply.(ahahahaha)

P.S:Been using Max/MSP for 10 days,it s a great tool , wanna keep going

My question was not complete, what i would like is to use the INPUTS(digidesign 888 I/O).I hope that writing the word digidesign does not restrict me from getting reply.(ahahahaha)
P.S:Been using Max/MSP for 10 days,it s a great tool , wanna keep going


If you wan't stream the sound from MaxMSP into ProTools, you could have a

It's discontinued, but I had it running in the OS 9 days.

Otherwise, for MaxMSP to play thru the 888 hardware, you will need an

ASIO driver for the 888 (don't know if it exists).

If you wan't stream the sound from MaxMSP into ProTools, you could have a
look at DirectConnect 

Otherwise, for MaxMSP to play thru the 888 hardware, you will need an
ASIO driver for the 888 (don't know if it exists). 

Thank you for replying, I have tried Directconnect with no success I ll keep trying different options

> My question was not complete, what i would like is to use the

> INPUTS(digidesign 888 I/O).I hope that writing the word digidesign

> does not restrict me from getting reply.(ahahahaha)

Its certainly not restricting you from getting a reply, but the word 

digidesign usually means there is no satisfying answer at all...

They just don't want you to use their hardware with other software, and 

they don't want you to use their older hardware at all. They want you to 

buy the newest and trash the old stuff and anything which doesn't fit 

Good luck, if you run OS 9, you should be able to find old drivers for 

their hardware, as usual not too reliable. I remeber that it was 

possible. I'll go through my old backups, maybe I can find those...

I'd love to see a law which would force any company to open all 

necessary details as soon they stop giving support for older 

hardware/software to enable people to DIY...

dunebuggy wrote:
> My question was not complete, what i would like is to use the
> INPUTS(digidesign 888 I/O).I hope that writing the word digidesign
> does not restrict me from getting reply.(ahahahaha)

Its certainly not restricting you from getting a reply, but the word 
digidesign usually means there is no satisfying answer at all...

They just don't want you to use their hardware with other software, and 
they don't want you to use their older hardware at all. They want you to 
buy the newest and trash the old stuff and anything which doesn't fit 
into their limited world.

Good luck, if you run OS 9, you should be able to find old drivers for 
their hardware, as usual not too reliable. I remeber that it was 
possible. I'll go through my old backups, maybe I can find those...

I'd love to see a law which would force any company to open all 
necessary details as soon they stop giving support for older 
hardware/software to enable people to DIY...

  [][]  [][][]  [][]  [][][]
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]

         Stefan Tiedje
         Klanggestalter
     Electronic Composition
               &
         Improvisation

            /~~~~~
     \   /|() ()|
     ))))) )|  |  |( \
     ///     _/)/ )))))
             ___/   ///

-------------------------x----
--_____-----------|-----------
--(_|_ ----|-----|-----()----
-- _|_)----|-----()-----------
----------()------------x-----

14, Av. Pr. Franklin Roosevelt,
94320 Thiais, France
Phone at CCMIX +33-1-57 42 91 09


I see that, Digi have a very efficient way of twisting the consumer arm , making him Upgrade...Because of the work(postproduction) , the compagny i m working for has to use protool , it s a a great software with amazing controlers and MaxMSP is installed in a less busy editing room.The trial version is ending in 16days and i see that MSP wont replace the 2447837 plug ins available from other developper.LIke i said earlier MSP is an amazing creative tool and for my personnal use i will have a different interface and a VST based software.

P.S:if you see some kind of a driver that might work , i m interested(grinny smile ).......

I see that, Digi have a very efficient way of twisting the consumer arm , making him Upgrade...Because of the work(postproduction) , the compagny i m working for has to use protool , it s a a great software with amazing controlers and MaxMSP is installed in a less busy editing room.The trial version is ending in 16days and i see that MSP wont replace the 2447837 plug ins available from other developper.LIke i said earlier MSP is an amazing creative tool and for my personnal use i will have a different interface and a VST based software.
A+
Eric
P.S:if you see some kind of a driver that might work , i m interested(grinny smile ).......


> and i see that MSP wont replace the 2447837 plug ins available from

But almost... For me Max/MSP is the tool which turns even ProTools into 

a creative suite. Whenever I need a crazy effect, I make a pluggo. Which 

easily replace circa 2447832 of those plug ins. I made filters, playable 

in quarter tones, a spacialisation which is not restricted to the x.1 

cage, a denoiser, a granulator.... None of them existed, in the way I 

would want them, on the "market" (for good reasons I guess). Now I think 

its faster to build exactly the tool I need, than searching for somthing 

which might be close to what I need, but never fits exact.

dunebuggy wrote:
> and i see that MSP wont replace the 2447837 plug ins available from
> other developper.

But almost... For me Max/MSP is the tool which turns even ProTools into 
a creative suite. Whenever I need a crazy effect, I make a pluggo. Which 
easily replace circa 2447832 of those plug ins. I made filters, playable 
in quarter tones, a spacialisation which is not restricted to the x.1 
cage, a denoiser, a granulator.... None of them existed, in the way I 
would want them, on the "market" (for good reasons I guess). Now I think 
its faster to build exactly the tool I need, than searching for somthing 
which might be close to what I need, but never fits exact.

Quote: Stefan Tiedje wrote on Sat, 11 March 2006 14:55

> a creative suite. Whenever I need a crazy effect, I make a pluggo.

That is exactly my intention , but i notice problems occur when TDM and Pluggo based plug ins are mixed together in the same sessions.Not that i m trying to be the Devil s advocate but for standard compression , parametric EQ , GRM filters and pitch shift 

TCelectronics , WAves , GRM are tools that i used A LOT and there satisfying. Is there still stability problems (between Pluggo and TDM) on OS X ?

Quote: Stefan Tiedje wrote on Sat, 11 March 2006 14:55
But almost... For me Max/MSP is the tool which turns even ProTools into 
> a creative suite. Whenever I need a crazy effect, I make a pluggo.
 That is exactly my intention , but i notice problems occur when TDM and Pluggo based plug ins are mixed together in the same sessions.Not that i m trying to be the Devil s advocate but for standard compression , parametric EQ , GRM filters and pitch shift  
TCelectronics , WAves , GRM are tools that i used A LOT and there satisfying. Is there still stability problems (between Pluggo and TDM) on OS X ?
 Eric


> Is there still stability problems (between Pluggo and TDM) on OS X ?

I don't know, as I can't afford a TDM system ;-()

But I don't know what should cause a problem, the only thing I can 

imagine are timing/latency issues, but thats something you can always 

(Or Dizzydeisign designed it purposely bad...)

Anyway if its just Pluggo related let us and C74 know whats up.

dunebuggy wrote:
> Is there still stability problems (between Pluggo and TDM) on OS X ?

I don't know, as I can't afford a TDM system ;-()
But I don't know what should cause a problem, the only thing I can 
imagine are timing/latency issues, but thats something you can always 
work around...
(Or Dizzydeisign designed it purposely bad...)

Output thru digidesign888 I/O