<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: oversampling efficiency in polyphonic synths</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/oversampling-efficiency-in-polyphonic-synths/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/oversampling-efficiency-in-polyphonic-synths/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/oversampling-efficiency-in-polyphonic-synths/#post-49665</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[oversampling efficiency in polyphonic synths]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/oversampling-efficiency-in-polyphonic-synths/#post-49665</link>
					<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>oli larkin</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>If i have a polyphonic FM synth using poly~ and i want to oversample, what do people think is the most efficient strategy?</p>
<p>1 &#8211; use one, single voice &#8220;master poly~&#8221; patch that is upsampled (with antialiasing filters before the outputs). Inside this poly would be another poly with say 8 voices for my synth.</p>
<p>2 &#8211; have an 8 voice poly~ and put another (oversampled) poly~ inside each voice for as little of the signal path as possible (including antialiasing filters before downsampling).</p>
<p>I suppose i have to try it and see&#8230;</p>
<p>oli</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

