millenliam

When you combine data into a [pak] object and then [unpack] that data, if you change one of the values going into [pak] then ALL the values coming out of [unpack] are sent again. For example, if you had 4 buttons attached to a [pak] object which is then routed to an [unpack] object attached to 4 buttons, if you bang one of the initial buttons, it bangs ALL of second set of buttons. My question is as follows; is there an object, or a way of using [pak]/[unpack], that would allow data to be packed and unpacked independently without re-sending the other packed data? For example, with the example above, if you pressed the second button, it would only bang the second button the second set of buttons?

packing-data-that-can-be-unpacked-independently

Would it be too much hassle for you to show me a simple example of how I would go about using those objects to do what I described above?

I want to send data; maybe the bangs example was a bad one. I just don't want every value coming out of [unpack] to be 're-sent' when only a single value is changed.

Maybe all I need is an object that will only output the input if it has changed since it was last outputted; is there an object of that description?

I want to send data; maybe the bangs example was a bad one. I just don't want every value coming out of [unpack] to be 're-sent' when only a single value is changed. 

Maybe all I need is an object that will only output the input if it has changed since it was last outputted; is there an object of that description?


Yeah thats the kind of thing I was looking for. Thanks!

@ elliot paris: Probably missing something but there's no added functionality right? I mean the same can be done with less objects.

>> @ elliot paris: Probably missing something but there's no added

>> functionality right? I mean the same can be done with less objects.

>> @ elliot paris: Probably missing something but there's no added
>> functionality right? I mean the same can be done with less objects.

sorry i'm confused for my last post, you'r right, my last patch no added functionality..

I don't know where was my mind this day..

a simple combinaison of funnel/spray would have worked as well..

sorry i'm confused for my last post, you'r right, my last patch no added functionality..
I don't know where was my mind this day..
a simple combinaison of funnel/spray would have worked as well..


'packing' data that can be 'unpacked' independently