Mattijs

Hi, I wondered if this behaviour was intentional. The pattrhub seems to defer its output to the end of the queue.

pattrhub-does-deferlow

> Hi, I wondered if this behaviour was intentional. The pattrhub seems

> to defer its output to the end of the queue.

I can't reproduce. And as your patch doesn't test it, I moved the print 

1 to the left, and it will fire after the print 2.

Mattijs Kneppers wrote:
> Hi, I wondered if this behaviour was intentional. The pattrhub seems
> to defer its output to the end of the queue.

I can't reproduce. And as your patch doesn't test it, I moved the print 
1 to the left, and it will fire after the print 2.
Not deferred on my machine...

-- 
Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
--_____-----------|--------------
--(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
-- _|_)----|-----()--------------
----------()--------www.ccmix.com


I believe he do test it, and it seems to be defered here on Mac OSX 

10.4.7, Max 4.5.7. All 4 "print 1" are printed before any of the "print 

2". If it was not defered, print 1 and 2 should be merged. This is what 

I believe he do test it, and it seems to be defered here on Mac OSX 
10.4.7, Max 4.5.7. All 4 "print 1" are printed before any of the "print 
2". If it was not defered, print 1 and 2 should be merged. This is what 
I get in the Max window:

1: getanswer
1: getanswer
1: getanswer
1: getanswer
2: answer 42
2: answer 42
2: answer 42
2: answer 42


Max 4.5.7 with incremental pattrhub update

I see that on the 18th of March, I "fixed a defer_low bug in anything 

method", according to my notes, which involved removing the 

unnecessary defer from the code. Are you guys running the pattrhub 

from the incremental updates page? Because that version should have 

the correct code in it, and works properly on my 4.5.7 install.

Am 09.10.2006 um 10:55 schrieb Trond Lossius:

> I believe he do test it, and it seems to be defered here on Mac OSX 

> 10.4.7, Max 4.5.7. All 4 "print 1" are printed before any of the 

> "print 2". If it was not defered, print 1 and 2 should be merged. 

Max 4.6.2, OSX 10.4.8:
Max 4.5.7 with incremental pattrhub update

1: getanswer
2: answer 42
1: getanswer
2: answer 42
1: getanswer
2: answer 42
1: getanswer
2: answer 42

I see that on the 18th of March, I "fixed a defer_low bug in anything  
method", according to my notes, which involved removing the  
unnecessary defer from the code. Are you guys running the pattrhub  
from the incremental updates page? Because that version should have  
the correct code in it, and works properly on my 4.5.7 install.

> I believe he do test it, and it seems to be defered here on Mac OSX  
> 10.4.7, Max 4.5.7. All 4 "print 1" are printed before any of the  
> "print 2". If it was not defered, print 1 and 2 should be merged.  
> This is what I get in the Max window:
>
> 1: getanswer
> 1: getanswer
> 1: getanswer
> 1: getanswer
> 2: answer 42
> 2: answer 42
> 2: answer 42
> 2: answer 42

Ah, I should have included version info and my output. Sorry for that. I use Max 4.5.7, without the incremental pattrhub update. I got the same output as Trond. Good to know it has been fixed!

Upgrading to the incremental pattrhub solved the problem. Thanks for the 

new layout of the incremental page, it makes it a lot easier to know 

> Max 4.5.7 with incremental pattrhub update

> I see that on the 18th of March, I "fixed a defer_low bug in anything 

> method", according to my notes, which involved removing the 

> unnecessary defer from the code. Are you guys running the pattrhub 

> from the incremental updates page? Because that version should have 

> the correct code in it, and works properly on my 4.5.7 install.

> Am 09.10.2006 um 10:55 schrieb Trond Lossius:

>> I believe he do test it, and it seems to be defered here on Mac OSX 

>> 10.4.7, Max 4.5.7. All 4 "print 1" are printed before any of the 

>> "print 2". If it was not defered, print 1 and 2 should be merged. 

Upgrading to the incremental pattrhub solved the problem. Thanks for the 
new layout of the incremental page, it makes it a lot easier to know 
what updates do exist.

Jeremy Bernstein wrote:
> Max 4.6.2, OSX 10.4.8:
> Max 4.5.7 with incremental pattrhub update
>
> 1: getanswer
> 2: answer 42
> 1: getanswer
> 2: answer 42
> 1: getanswer
> 2: answer 42
> 1: getanswer
> 2: answer 42
>
> I see that on the 18th of March, I "fixed a defer_low bug in anything 
> method", according to my notes, which involved removing the 
> unnecessary defer from the code. Are you guys running the pattrhub 
> from the incremental updates page? Because that version should have 
> the correct code in it, and works properly on my 4.5.7 install.
>
> jb
>
> Am 09.10.2006 um 10:55 schrieb Trond Lossius:
>
>> I believe he do test it, and it seems to be defered here on Mac OSX 
>> 10.4.7, Max 4.5.7. All 4 "print 1" are printed before any of the 
>> "print 2". If it was not defered, print 1 and 2 should be merged. 
>> This is what I get in the Max window:
>>
>> 1: getanswer
>> 1: getanswer
>> 1: getanswer
>> 1: getanswer
>> 2: answer 42
>> 2: answer 42
>> 2: answer 42
>> 2: answer 42
>
>
>


pattrhub does deferlow?