pattrinit

Nov 2, 2006 at 6:53pm

pattrinit

This is just an idea:
At the moment I use pattrstorage to store the last state of a patch. It
will initialise to the last values if I reload. Fine, but I’d like to
use this simple technique for small subpatchers as well, but without
creating an extra XML file.
Here the request: a simplified pattrstorage, with only one “preset”
called pattrinit. Its sole purpose is to initialise objects exposed by
an autopattr. These values should be stored (embedded) in the patcher
itself. I’d like to avoid an external XML file for that. It should be
possible to hide/expose a part or all of the objects to a parent
pattrstorage (for a global storage)…

This would just help to get rid of all the loadmess mess I usually put
up for initialisation. On top of it it should be possible to recall the
last saved values with an init message…

Let me know if anybody thinks this is a good idea…

Stefan


Stefan Tiedje————x——-
–_____———–|————–
–(_|_ —-|—–|—–()——-
– _|_)—-|—–()————–
———-()——–www.ccmix.com

#28492
Nov 2, 2006 at 8:51pm

Stefan Tiedje wrote:
> This is just an idea:

Oh, no, just found out autopattr does all, I just thought it was
pattrstorage…

No need for a pattrinit…

Stefan


Stefan Tiedje————x——-
–_____———–|————–
–(_|_ —-|—–|—–()——-
– _|_)—-|—–()————–
———-()——–www.ccmix.com

#87533
Nov 5, 2006 at 2:24pm

The only difference between “pattrinit” and autopattr/pattr is this
“init” message, no? When you save a patch, autopattr/pattr remembers
and restores those values the next time the patch is loaded. Or am I
misunderstanding?

jb

Am 02.11.2006 um 19:53 schrieb Stefan Tiedje:

> Here the request: a simplified pattrstorage, with only one “preset”
> called pattrinit. Its sole purpose is to initialise objects exposed
> by an autopattr. These values should be stored (embedded) in the
> patcher itself. I’d like to avoid an external XML file for that. It
> should be possible to hide/expose a part or all of the objects to a
> parent pattrstorage (for a global storage)…
>
> This would just help to get rid of all the loadmess mess I usually
> put up for initialisation. On top of it it should be possible to
> recall the last saved values with an init message…

#87534
Nov 5, 2006 at 5:13pm

Jeremy Bernstein wrote:
> The only difference between “pattrinit” and autopattr/pattr is this
> “init” message, no? When you save a patch, autopattr/pattr remembers
> and restores those values the next time the patch is loaded. Or am I
> misunderstanding?

You are right. An init message to autopattr which would revert to the
original values would do it… (and is the better solution anyway)
Its not urgent, I was in a brain smash or something…

Stefan


Stefan Tiedje————x——-
–_____———–|————–
–(_|_ —-|—–|—–()——-
– _|_)—-|—–()————–
———-()——–www.ccmix.com

#87535

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.