Isn't it possible to set priorities of some items that are within abstractions, from the top level patcher?

Here is an example patch showing what I would like to achieve :

(this example uses embedded bpatchers instead of abstractions, but that's the same issue)

Isn't it possible to set priorities of some items that are within abstractions, from the top level patcher?
I'm probably missing something here...

pattrstorage-priorities-issue

You are just missing a colon. You want something like, 'priority A::A_number $1' and 'priority A::B::B_number $1'.

One thing, setting the priority of 'A' or 'B,' which are patchers, doesn't really make any sense, at least to me.

You are just missing a colon.  You want something like, 'priority A::A_number $1' and 'priority A::B::B_number $1'.  

Patchers' priorities make sense to me. I think that if A got a lower priorities than B, its items will be restored first, even if all the items in A and B got the same priorities. At least I expect it. gonna give it a try.

...ok! :)
Thanks for pointing out my typo mistake.

One can set the topmost patcher's priority, but subsequent patchers within the hierarchy will always be restored top down. From the ref:

"Priority is only respected within a single level of the patcher hierarchy. Data in parent patchers will always be restored before data in nested patchers."

One can set the topmost patcher's priority, but subsequent patchers within the hierarchy will always be restored top down.  From the ref:

Yes, sorry, the A and B of my example patch were not a good example for that.

In my last post I was thinking of A and B as two patches at the same level.

Yes, sorry, the A and B of my example patch were not a good example for that.
In my last post I was thinking of A and B as two patches at the same level.
Charles


pattrstorage - priorities issue