pattrstorage-unable-to-set-bpatchers-priorities-when-more-than-1-level-below

Hi there,
Took a while, but i think this is it!
Edit: "priority A::A_number $1"
"priorityA::B::B_number $1"
Let us know!


I don't want to set priorities for A_number or B_number,

cause I wan't to be sure that, for example, everything in A will be recalled

And as " Priorities only operate within a particular hierarchical level", I think just setting priorities of A_number and B_number won't assure that (?)

plus, when you got a lot of things in A and B, global priorities would be nice...

I don't want to set priorities for A_number or B_number,
but global priorities for A and B.
cause I wan't to be sure that, for example, everything in A will be recalled
before everything in B.
And as " Priorities only operate within a particular hierarchical level", I think just setting priorities of A_number and B_number won't assure that (?)
plus, when you got a lot of things in A and B, global priorities would be nice...


I couldn't figure out setting global properties, I'll take a look again.

It also says in the reference though, that parent patchers always have priority over their child patchers.

So, as far as I know, A will always have priority over B and C.

Hi Ch,
I couldn't figure out setting global properties, I'll take a look again.
It also says in the reference though, that parent patchers always have priority over their child patchers.
So, as far as I know, A will always have priority over B and C.


Oh, sorry, I didnt want to say "A" and "B", but B and C.

I don't want to set priorities for B_number or C_number,

cause I wan't to be sure that, for example, everything in B will be recalled

And as " Priorities only operate within a particular hierarchical level", I think just setting priorities of B_number and C_number won't assure that (?)

plus, when you got a lot of things in B and C, global priorities would be nice...

Note that it is possible to set a "global" priority for "A". The issue is when the bpatcher is "more than 1 level below".

Oh, sorry, I didnt want to say "A" and "B", but B and C.
My previous post should read :

I don't want to set priorities for B_number or C_number,
but global priorities for B and C.
cause I wan't to be sure that, for example, everything in B will be recalled
before everything in C.
And as " Priorities only operate within a particular hierarchical level", I think just setting priorities of B_number and C_number won't assure that (?)
plus, when you got a lot of things in B and C, global priorities would be nice... 

Note that it is possible to set a "global" priority for "A". The issue is when the bpatcher is "more than 1 level below".


Seemed to work by adding a pattrstorage in A. My guess is that Pattrstorage in the top level patcher will not treat the child patchers as clients unless other Pattrstorage objects are present. It seems [autopattr] only reveals anything with a scripting name.

Seemed to work by adding a pattrstorage in A. My guess is that Pattrstorage in the top level patcher will not treat the child patchers as clients unless other Pattrstorage objects are present. It seems [autopattr] only reveals anything with a scripting name.
What do you think?


pattrstorage. unable to set bpatchers priorities (when more than 1 level below)