<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: Phase Ofset on tri~, saw~, rect~ possible?</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/phase-ofset-on-tri-saw-rect-possible/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/phase-ofset-on-tri-saw-rect-possible/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/phase-ofset-on-tri-saw-rect-possible/#post-32862</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Phase Ofset on tri~, saw~, rect~ possible?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/phase-ofset-on-tri-saw-rect-possible/#post-32862</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>steffensen</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>As the Title implies, is there some way to do phase ofset on the above mentioned osc&#8217;s? <br />
Just like i can drive a cycle~ with phasor~, and scroll thru the phase.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/phase-ofset-on-tri-saw-rect-possible/#post-108733</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Phase Ofset on tri~, saw~, rect~ possible?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/phase-ofset-on-tri-saw-rect-possible/#post-108733</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>steffensen</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Using a wave~ and sampling the diff waveforms, is one option however..</p>
<p>I wonder if there is a difference in quality regarding this, if sampling i mean?</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/phase-ofset-on-tri-saw-rect-possible/#post-108734</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Phase Ofset on tri~, saw~, rect~ possible?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/phase-ofset-on-tri-saw-rect-possible/#post-108734</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Roman Thilenius</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Quote: steffensen wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 14:40<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
> Using a wave~ and sampling the diff waveforms, is one option however..<br />
> <br />
> I wonder if there is a difference in quality regarding this, if sampling i mean? <br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>
if you make no mistake, no. [wave~] is interpolating.</p>
<p>it might be a good idea to build your own &#8220;oscillators&#8221; based<br />
on wave~ as it gives you additional options (like playing 2 channels at once)</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/phase-ofset-on-tri-saw-rect-possible/#post-108735</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Phase Ofset on tri~, saw~, rect~ possible?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/phase-ofset-on-tri-saw-rect-possible/#post-108735</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>steffensen</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks again Roman. :)</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/phase-ofset-on-tri-saw-rect-possible/#post-108736</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Phase Ofset on tri~, saw~, rect~ possible?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/phase-ofset-on-tri-saw-rect-possible/#post-108736</link>
					<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>bin</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>i thought saw~ rect~ and tri~ were anti aliasing bandlimited? i don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll get wave~ to do the same thing. would be cool to be able to phase drive those oscillators though</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/phase-ofset-on-tri-saw-rect-possible/#post-108737</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Phase Ofset on tri~, saw~, rect~ possible?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/phase-ofset-on-tri-saw-rect-possible/#post-108737</link>
					<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 12:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>steffensen</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I actually ended up converting the phasor to a cosine, and converting the cosine into saw, rect, tri etc. Im quite pleased with the results, as i got tons of diff variations of the usual waveforms. Still working on those little dips thats in the original saw~ and rect~, however.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

