<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: pict resolution</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pict-resolution/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pict-resolution/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pict-resolution/#post-33581</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[pict resolution]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pict-resolution/#post-33581</link>
					<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>viddhi</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>hi people,</p>
<p>i have some problems with the resolution&#8230;  the pictures i have are 2400 x 1995  and 72 pixel/inch.</p>
<p>i think they&#8217;re very big to work with in jitter, but when i change the resolution to for exemple 1024 x 768, then the projection is not so good&#8230;. i can see the pixels.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m working with jit.qt.movie 2400 1995&#8230; and i have a lot of matrix objects&#8230; i think it&#8217;s not a good idea&#8230;  it&#8217;s too big for the patch&#8230;  </p>
<p>what do you think about it??  some advices???</p>
<p>thanks!!!</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pict-resolution/#post-112049</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: pict resolution]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pict-resolution/#post-112049</link>
					<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>you can &#8220;pan &#038; scan&#8221; across the image with jit.submatrix or by</p>
<p>[jit.qt.movie <a href='http://cycling74.com/forums/users/adapt/' rel='nofollow' class='bbp-mention-link adapt'>@adapt</a> 1]<br />
|<br />
[jit.gl.videoplane foo]</p>
<p>and move the videoplane around to pan and scan.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pict-resolution/#post-112050</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: pict resolution]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pict-resolution/#post-112050</link>
					<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Wetterberg</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Dan Winckler skrev:<br />
> you can &#8220;pan &#038; scan&#8221; across the image with jit.submatrix or by<br />
><br />
> [jit.qt.movie <a href='http://cycling74.com/forums/users/adapt/' rel='nofollow' class='bbp-mention-link adapt'>@adapt</a> 1]<br />
> |<br />
> [jit.gl.videoplane foo] <br />
Or by using jit.rota or the rota shader.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pict-resolution/#post-112051</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: pict resolution]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pict-resolution/#post-112051</link>
					<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Oh, and the GPU route is most likely going to be the fastest &#8212;  <br />
jit.gl.videoplane or the rota shader (see td.rota.jxs-help.mxb).</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

