<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: Pluggo update?</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-43695</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-43695</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 13:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Anthony Palomba</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Can someone at Cycling give us an update on the progress <br />
of pluggo for Max5?</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156816</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156816</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>ComfortableInClouds</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>am i wrong to assume that M4L and pluggo share a lot of the same programming obstacles, and thus pluggo should be released shortly after M4L? i seem to intuitively think this, but haven&#8217;t heard anything about a projected release date for pluggo (ie, this year), while M4L seems set to be released for this year.</p>
<p>i am a little bit frustrated by C74 focusing on undertaking this huge project for Ableton users, when the current version of their <i>own</i> product for their <i>own </i>users still lacks one of the most useful and applicable features of previous versions.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156817</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156817</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Anthony Palomba</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I agree! Pluggo was a crucial part of my music making process back when I was using Max4. I have been significantly handicapped by its absence in Max5. I hope Cycling still plans on releasing <br />
pluggo. As great as M4L is, I really don&#8217;t feel like I should have <br />
to pay $500+ for functionality that I already had with my existing <br />
sequencer and pluggo.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156818</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156818</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Pierre Alexandre Tremblay</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>+1</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156819</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156819</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Lid</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>+2</p>
<p>I must sign this petition too&#8230;. I thought they would have sorted this out awhile ago&#8230;</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156820</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156820</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>pencilina</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>+5 (for me and two other pluggo pals)</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156821</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156821</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Brad Garton</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I asked David this very question (&#8220;what&#8217;s the deal with pluggo/Max 5?&#8221;) at the Expo &#8217;74 conference last week, and it seems that pluggo will not be happening any more.  HOWEVER &#8212; I was as sad as I&#8217;m sure many of you are until I heard they plans Cycling are making to replace it, and I am much more excited about the possibilities they are envisioning.  So I would have been a + person on this thread, except the alternatives being explored are a whole lot better.  I gotta give these Cycling people some credit&#8230;</p>
<p>As a programmer, I can also appreciate how annoying it has been to maintain support for the ever-shifting VST &#8216;standard&#8217;, even though I am a major pluggo user.</p>
<p>brad<br />
<a href="http://music.columbia.edu/~brad">http://music.columbia.edu/~brad</a></p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156822</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156822</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Jean-Francois Charles</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>My feeling after participating at expo74 is that cycling74 are working on Max for Live, and they are making it very nice. They are bringing into the project far more possibilities than what the VST protocol has allowed for.<br />
But, as Brad says, what we heard let us guess that we should not expect any export from Max to VST as what existed in Max 4.<br />
Brad is really excited about another kind of alternative, but that won&#8217;t happen soon, as far as I understood.<br />
Jean-François.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156823</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156823</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Roman Thilenius</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>
excuse my ignorance, but why do people not just<br />
leave their max 460 installed and build their <br />
plugs in 460?<br />
or are you keen on transparancy and presentation <br />
mode and these things which will make pluggo runtime<br />
about 5 times slower than 4?</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156824</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156824</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Anthony Palomba</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>
<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1">
<tr>
<td class="SmallText"><b>Brad Garton wrote on Wed, 06 May 2009 14:17</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="quote">I was as sad as I&#8217;m sure many of you are until I heard the plans Cycling are making to replace it, and I am much more excited about the possibilities they are envisioning.  &#8230;alternatives being explored are a whole lot better.  I gotta give these Cycling people some credit&#8230;</td></tr></table></p>



<p>Well that makes me sad as well. But I am intrigued by these<br />
plans Cycling is making to replace it. Can you shed some light on <br />
the details of these new plans? Is it something beyond M4L?</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156825</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156825</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Anthony Palomba</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>
<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1">
<tr>
<td class="SmallText"><b>Roman Thilenius wrote on Wed, 06 May 2009 16:38</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="quote">
excuse my ignorance, but why do people not just<br />
leave their max 460 installed and build their <br />
plugs in 460?<br />
or are you keen on transparancy and presentation <br />
mode and these things which will make pluggo runtime<br />
about 5 times slower than 4?</td>
</tr>
</table>
</p><p>Well the problem is I can not load my Max5 patches in Max4.<br />
Presentation mode, File browser, zooming, etc. are huge <br />
improvements and make patching easier and faster for me.<br />
What good is a new patching environment if I can not use it?<br />
I don&#8217;t have time to maintain two versions of a patch. To <br />
be quite honest with you, Max5 is so nice to work in<br />
that using Max4 is painful now.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156826</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156826</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Roman Thilenius</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p><table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1">
<tr>
<td class="SmallText"><b>Anthony Palomba wrote on Thu, 07 May 2009 00:57</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="quote">
Well the problem is I can not load my Max5 patches in Max4.</td></tr></table></p>



<p>right, that makes sense. </p>
<p>for some reason i was assuming that most pluggo plug-in <br />
are only consist of 20 objects and can be (re)built in<br />
a few minutes in max 4. but of course after more than a <br />
year of max5 you might have a bunch of new max5 objects<br />
and abstractions and all this plus you are used to patching<br />
in 5.</p>
<p>-110</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156827</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156827</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Matthew Aidekman</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Advanced apologies for grammar etc.  iv in my right arm&#8230;  not great for typing.</p>
<p>
very exciting news&#8230; but&#8230;.</p>
<p>
I love this business, the software and the people but&#8230;  pluggo has repeatedly shown their unfavorable side &#8230;</p>
<p>this really hurts.  </p>
<p>I bought pluggo twice.  developing plugins was a decent part of my business.  now developing plugins isn&#8217;t even supported on my computer and still i was told pluggo would be updated.  only now do i receive this unofficial rumor that the software is officially dead.</p>
<p>
The reason people buy software is that there is an understanding and faith that it continues to function decently.  thats the same reason i buy software that requires an authorization key.  i have faith that the company will keep my software authorized indefinitely.  people expect that if you replace one app with another, you don&#8217;t kill the first in the interim.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m your biggest fan. honest. One of the reasons is transparency.  Having personal, continuing support from such intelligent minds is amazing.  But pluggo has felt like the run-around from the beginning.  Come on guys step up and say *something* officially.  Im not going all zolt on ya here.  Business is business but be honest!</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156828</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156828</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>ComfortableInClouds</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Could someone please explain how M4L is supposed to be better than pluggo? </p>
<p>I can understand the convenience of having Max opened up inside Ableton, but if pluggo were developed instead, one could simply convert patches to VSTs then use those VSTs within not only Ableton, but Cubase, Renoise, Digital Performer, etc. etc. With Pluggo, it wasn&#8217;t just Max 4 Live, it was Max 4 any audio application with VST support (which is a lot). M4L seems only mildly more convenient since you don&#8217;t have to convert the patch to a pluggo patch, and you don&#8217;t have to open  Max. Big whoop.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156829</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156829</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 08:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Pierre Alexandre Tremblay</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I am interested in the motivation of the decision, i.e. maybe a real market study of the actual pluggo users who would upgrade to a version supporting 5.</p>
<p>I am personally responsible of 65 licenses that I would upgrade, and there is no way I am going near live for many reasons. I am certain there are a lot of us out there!</p>
<p>pa</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156830</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156830</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>oli larkin</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I too would be extremely disappointed if there was no way to export to VST/ AU from Max5. It would be nice to have some official comment on this.</p>
<p>oli</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156831</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156831</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>ferguson@music.mcgill.ca</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Waiting to see what this new solution is, but I hope it doesn&#8217;t exclusively rely on Live, which is not necessarily the ideal tool for all users.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156832</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156832</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Pierre Alexandre Tremblay</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>
<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1">
<tr>
<td class="SmallText"><b><a href="mailto:ferguson@music.mcgill.ca">ferguson@music.mcgill.ca</a> wrote on Thu, 07 May 2009 17:40</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="quote">which is not necessarily the ideal tool for all users.</td>
</tr>
</table>
</p><p>or should I rephrase</p>
<p>which is necessarily not the ideal tool for most users&#8230;</p>
<p>pa</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156833</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156833</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>f.e</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Je plussoie, Pierre-Alexandre.</p>
<p>Live is really not my cup of tea. </p>
<p>Nevertheless, i&#8217;ve planned to buy it anyway with m4l, because it seems c74 has chosen Ableton to give us a timeline, instead of building a new one.</p>
<p>But it won&#8217;t help people who *need* to work with other workstations, *with* their pluggos&#8230;</p>
<p>f.e</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156834</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156834</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>broc</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>
<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1">
<tr>
<td class="SmallText"><b><a href="mailto:ferguson@music.mcgill.ca">ferguson@music.mcgill.ca</a> wrote on Thu, 07 May 2009 18:40</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="quote">Waiting to see what this new solution is, but I hope it doesn&#8217;t exclusively rely on Live..</td>
</tr>
</table>
</p><p>
For the short term the solution will certainly be restricted to Max and Live. But in the long run it may evolve to a new standard format for integration of different audio applications in general.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156835</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156835</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Roald Baudoux</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>It&#8217;s not difficult to understand that C74 doesn&#8217;t earn much from people who build their plug-ins themselves with Max because the Pluggo Runtime version is free and these people would probably buy Max whatsoever. There is much more to gain financially from Max for Live. Rational thinking, &#8220;il faut faire tourner la boutique&#8221;.</p>
<p>However I still hope Pluggo for Max 5 will come in a decently close future. Qui vivra verra&#8230;</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156836</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156836</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dan Nigrin</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>
<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1">
<tr>
<td class="SmallText"><b>oli larkin wrote on Thu, 07 May 2009 11:22</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="quote">I too would be extremely disappointed if there was no way to export to VST/ AU from Max5. It would be nice to have some official comment on this.</td></tr></table></p>
<p>oli


</p><p>
Me too guys.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156837</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156837</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Jean-Francois Charles</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>This &#8220;pluggo&#8221; name has always been confusing. There is on the one side the ability for Max4 to export a patch as VST plugin, and on the other side the &#8220;pluggo plugins&#8221;, actual pluggins that were (are?) sold by cycling74.<br />
-the export as VST plugin &#8220;seems to be dead in its Max4 form&#8221;. Short term replacement will be M4L.<br />
-the pluggo plugins may not disappear completely. I understood that a number of them would be made available as Max for Live patches.<br />
By the way, this is unofficial information. It&#8217;s what I understood during the expo, and I&#8217;m not a native English speaker.<br />
J-F</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156838</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156838</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>the_man361</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>i was really bargaining on being able to export to VST when i initially bought max5.. hopefully there will be some official clarification on it soon.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156839</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Pluggo update?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/pluggo-update/#post-156839</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 23:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>ComfortableInClouds</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>A quote from David Zicarelli upon Max 5&#8242;s release (from <a href="http://www.cycling74.com/story/2007/9/28/105551/882">http://www.cycling74.com/story/2007/9/28/105551/882</a>)</p>
<p>&#8220;Another thing that won&#8217;t work is Pluggo plug-ins based on Max 4. These will need to be converted to a new format based on Max 5. Unfortunately, this new format is unlikely to be ready when Max 5 is first released. If your life revolves around plug-in development, you&#8217;ll probably want to wait to upgrade until we change our plug-in support to work with the new core environment.&#8221;</p>
<p>By using the term &#8220;unlikely&#8221;, it made it seem like pluggo was right around the corner for Max 5, that it might even be possible it would be released when Max 5 was released. Could someone from C74 please explain why it has been so time consuming to develop pluggo for Max 5 and why you are now ditching it all together (much to the frustration of a large amount of your users)?</p>
<p>I also read this article <a href="http://www.cycling74.com/story/2009/1/15/112631/799">http://www.cycling74.com/story/2009/1/15/112631/799</a> to better understand why M4L is so much better than pluggo. To me, it seems that with M4L you&#8217;ll be able to use Max inside Ableton to manipulate and synthesize audio and to manipulate and generate midi information&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;this is different from using patches as VSTs in what way exactly? Oh &#8211; Max is now &#8220;inside&#8221; Ableton&#8230;..so what?</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

